Author
|
Topic: Elmo GS1200 Halogen VS Elmo GS Xenon -My thoughts!
|
Alan Rik
Film God
Posts: 2211
From: New York City, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
|
posted March 26, 2004 05:40 PM
I have owned both machines and I have to say that for home viewing, I really prefer the halogen. As much as I loved the light of the Xenon, the machine with its fan was very loud to my ears. Also, now I don't have to worry about burning out the bulb. And this machine that I just picked up (Thanks Jan Fett!) is in truly awesome condition. It looks brand new and it has all the accessories that came with the machine. (Minus the short stereo film) This New Old Machine is very quiet, purrs like a kitten, is razor sharp (Put my 1.0 lens on this), sound is truly hi-fi, and the speed is perfect. No wavering, or warbling. After having so many second hand machines that were in very good condiition, it is so nice to have one that is as good as brand new. And it came wtih the remote, 2x1200 ft Elmo Reels, 800 ft reel, and the Attachment viewer. I just watched reel one of Pinocchio and everything is perfect!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Rik
Film God
Posts: 2211
From: New York City, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
|
posted March 27, 2004 07:32 AM
Well of course the Xenon lamp will be brighter and whiter! But that is when you are comparing them side by side. Most people, including myself, will not say, hmm....that picture on screen is a little yellow.. You will really only notice IF you are seeing them side by side. I havent had a Xenon in about 5 months and I wasn't really sure what to expect going back to the halogen. The first thing I noticed was the sound of the machine. Quieter? Much Quieter than the Xenon. The Xenon is really loud with the extra fan. The second thing I noticed was the quality of the sound reproduction. Since this machine was pretty brand new, I have to say that this was the best sound I have heard come from all my previous GS machines. Very clean and crisp. And since the machine was quieter, there was no need to turn it up as much as I was doing with the Xenon. The picture was very sharp as well. And not once did I say, "Man, I wish I had that Xenon" In fact, when the reel was over I totally forgot that the machine was halogen. Really! I know it is normal for all of us to keep wanting the best, the best, etc. Me too! The Xenon was primarily made for auditorium use. Im saying for your home, with you and the machine about 10-15 feet away from you, I would rather have a clean working Halogen machine! Dont get me wrong, if I found another Xenon cheap, I might get one, but I don't think the halogen owners out there are missing that much. Since we were talking about the different versions of the GS in another thread, I was a little saddened to know that this machine was one of the the first models produced. But I guess it is like a used car. If the machine has been maintained (Or better yet, never used!) then it will potentially be the best machine you have ever owned. I mean, this is cleaner then my first GS and the sound is rock steady, every film I have put through this thing (about 20 now!) comes out the other side nice and quiet. No scratches. If you are fortunate enough to have a GS, enjoy!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Quinn
Master Film Handler
Posts: 372
From: England, Bedfordshire.
Registered: Nov 2003
|
posted March 28, 2004 05:58 AM
Mike, I find it hard to believe why you want to have the GS on the lower lamp setting, i also project on to a 5ft screen and i wouldn't dream of projecting on the low lamp setting. As far as the noise issue, i don't think that i noticed it that much, yes it is noisier but i found that i paid no attention after a while. I must say though that some GS1200's have a very noisy 1st sprocket shoe, clattering away, now that is annoying, fortunately my is super quite, thanks to Mr Elmo.
-------------------- The other half thinks i'm up to something. Shes right of course.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|