8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » Son Of Frankenstein - Two Versions?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Son Of Frankenstein - Two Versions?
Brad Kimball
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1171
From: Highland Mills, NY USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted March 24, 2006 05:41 PM      Profile for Brad Kimball   Email Brad Kimball   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
According to the "Castle" book there are two different versions of the Castle 200'er. I screened the two copies I own. One is from the mid 70's in silent and the other is a sound version from the late 70's and I can't tell the difference.

 |  IP: Logged

Jan Bister
Darth 8mm

Posts: 2629
From: Ohio, USA
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted March 25, 2006 11:50 AM      Profile for Jan Bister   Email Jan Bister   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe he simply had two sons, one of which is mute. [Cool]

--------------------
Call me Phoenix. *dusts off the ashes*

 |  IP: Logged

John Hourigan
Master Film Handler

Posts: 301
From: Colorado U.S.A.
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted March 25, 2006 02:05 PM      Profile for John Hourigan   Email John Hourigan       Edit/Delete Post 
It's my understanding that the first 200' version of SON OF FRANKENSTEIN was issued around 1965, with the second version being issued in the mid-1970s. Maybe you have the silent and sound version of the 1970s version.

 |  IP: Logged

Gary Crawford
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 979
From: Manassas, VA. USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted March 27, 2006 07:51 AM      Profile for Gary Crawford     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have two copies of Son of Frankenstein......there were two editions of the "complete" edition...and there are some differences. In his book , CASTLE FILMS, Scott MacGillivray reports that "Castle issued two versions of Son of Frankenstein. The first edition , issued in 1965, concentrated on the talky laboratory scenes with Basil Rathbone, so the monster is motionless on the table for much of the time. In the mid 1970's , Castle recut the feature to include more action footage of Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi."

My regular 8 sound version is the latter version and my 16mm copy is the former. I had the 8mm since 1965 and when I got the 16mm copy a couple of years ago,it did strike me that there were differences, but I thought my memory of the 8mm version was faulty, but sure enough there ARE two different versions.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Kimball
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1171
From: Highland Mills, NY USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted January 01, 2008 01:27 PM      Profile for Brad Kimball   Email Brad Kimball   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So, back to my original question.... What exactly are the differences. I'd like to know what scenes differ from the 2 200' versions.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Kimball
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1171
From: Highland Mills, NY USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted January 23, 2009 02:46 PM      Profile for Brad Kimball   Email Brad Kimball   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Anybody still know what the significant differences are between the 2 versions?

[ January 24, 2009, 09:07 AM: Message edited by: Brad Kimball ]

 |  IP: Logged

Douglas Meltzer
Moderator

Posts: 4554
From: New York, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted January 23, 2009 10:31 PM      Profile for Douglas Meltzer   Email Douglas Meltzer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,

The most notable difference is in the "reviving the monster" scene, but there are subtle changes throughout.
The original version starts with the Castle titles over a light background. We then fade in to a locked door with "Verboten" posted on it. The camera cranes up to reveal the the Frankenstein name above the door.
In the revised version, Castle superimposed the titles over this door sequence.
Both versions then cut to a portrait of Henry Frankenstein, with Baron Wolf von Frankenstein (Basil Rathbone) and the butler drinking a toast. Ygor (Bela Lugosi) is seen looking in through the window.
Both versions then fade to breakfast the next morning. The original edit has little Peter von Frankenstein telling his parents he's going hunting for all sorts of wild animals. Elsa von Frankenstein asks her husband what that weird structure they see out the window is. He replies that it's his father's laboratory and he can't wait to see it. The revised edit eliminates Peter talking about hunting. It starts with Peter leaving breakfast and Elsa asking about the lab.
Both versions dissolve to Wolf walking up the hill to the lab. He goes in and sees the boiling sulfur pit. In the newer edit, we see that Ygor is watching from above. Both then cut to Wolf walking into a chamber where he is shocked to discover the Monster (Boris Karloff) lying on a slab. Ygor is also there. Ygor says Wolf and the Monster both had Heinrich Frankenstein as a father, but the Monster's mother was lightning. Wolf tells Ygor he's going to try to revive the monster and they need to get him upstairs.
The versions differ greatly here. The original includes a scene of lifting the monster (tied to a table) from downstairs by using a winch. Wolf and Ygor then recline the Monster to hook up the equipment. Cut to the machines running, sparks flying & Ygor getting an electric shock when he grabs the Monster's hand. This scene ends with Wolf saying he can't get the Monster out of his coma. The revised version leaves out the winch scene. It cuts straight to the machines running, Ygor gets his shock and then we dissolve to the Monster standing up, restored to life. Wolf tells Ygor that no one must know. The Monster sees his reflection in a mirror, but Ygor turns the mirror around. Wolf says that the Monster isn't "well in the brain". Ygor says he'll keep him in the lab.
In the new version, Police Inspector Krogh (Lionel Atwill) arrives at the house for a visit. We then are back at the lab where the monster is angry, climbs down a ladder and goes through a hidden passage that connects to young Peter's bedroom. He goes to pick up the boy, but the nanny comes in so the Monster chokes her. We then see Peter walking with the Monster to the lab.
Back to the original: we left off with Wolf failing to revive the Monster. It then cuts to the nanny sitting outside Peter's bedroom. She goes in, sees the Monster and gets choked.
Both versions: Wolf is playing a game of darts with the Inspector. Elsa finds the nanny and runs downstairs screaming.
Wolf races to the lab. In the new version, we see Krogh go upstairs to Peter's bedroom. He seems to know about the hidden passage.
Both versions: The Monster and Peter walk to the ladder near the sulfur pit. It looks like the Monster might throw the boy into the boiling pit, but instead helps him up the ladder.
Wolf and Elsa can't get through the lab door from the outside. Wolf climbs up and goes through a higher window.
Peter finishes climbing the ladder and kindly offers a helping hand to Frankenstein's Monster.
New version: The inspector climbs up the ladder.
Both versions: The Monster suddenly has Inspector Krogh's wooden arm and he's using it as a club (I guess Castle felt strongly about not showing the Monster ripping the arm off. They chose not to include it in either edit.). Krogh is firing his pistol at the Monster. Wolf grabs a chain from the upper level and swings down into the Monster, knocking him into the pit. Krogh opens the lab door so the happy family reunion can take place. End titles.

The recut helps to make better sense of things. Cutting from the Doctor saying he can't revive his father's creation to the Monster in the boy's bedroom is pretty jarring. Here we get to see the Monster brought back to life. This really shows that Castle Films cared about their product enough to offer a better cutdown than what was previously released. The leader actually reads "Recut New Vers 6/16/71".

Doug

--------------------
I think there's room for just one more film.....

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Spinks
Master Film Handler

Posts: 453
From: Barking, Essex, UK
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted January 24, 2009 07:28 AM      Profile for Paul Spinks   Email Paul Spinks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow Doug, thanks for describing both versions so well. The most obvious scene that could be spliced from the earlier edit to the later one would be the winching scene and then you would have a slightly longer digest,but would it be worth it when you consider the damage to the prints. The later edit is definitely the better one. I wonder if there are many super 8 sound editions of the original edit out there?

Paul.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Kimball
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1171
From: Highland Mills, NY USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted January 24, 2009 09:05 AM      Profile for Brad Kimball   Email Brad Kimball   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you soooooo much. I agree it sounds like the newer version is the way to go. Cool that you even have the recut date on the leader. Thanks again for the blow-by-blow description. Is this all from memory or did you use an editor/viewer to decifer the differences?

 |  IP: Logged

Marshall Crist
Master Film Handler

Posts: 300
From: San Pedro, CA USA
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted January 24, 2009 12:20 PM      Profile for Marshall Crist   Email Marshall Crist   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wonder if the Uni 8 400' reel shows the Inspector's arm getting ripped off. I'm pretty sure it doesn not include the backstory that would put it in context.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Caruso
Film God

Posts: 4105
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted January 24, 2009 03:16 PM      Profile for Joe Caruso     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Doug, can you (or anyone) post a shot of the these CASTLE Super 8 Sound-Color box covers; Not the generic ones - LONDON LANDMARKS, LAND OF THE SHAMROCK, THE SURF RIDERS and SAN JUAN CITY OF CONTRAST - I'd pay to have copy/scans of these, or better still the boxes themselves (with or without the prints) - That's Shorty

 |  IP: Logged

Douglas Meltzer
Moderator

Posts: 4554
From: New York, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted January 24, 2009 04:23 PM      Profile for Douglas Meltzer   Email Douglas Meltzer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You're welcome!
Brad, I watched them both last night and took notes.
Paul, it's probably not worth it to edit the two together. I thought about it, but then we're still left with a bad edit from Wolf saying he can't wake the Monster to a shot of the Monster standing tall.
Marshall, that's one of the few U-8 horrors that I don't have. Andy Wilson wrote a review but he doesn't mention that scene. Can you let us know Andy?
Joe, sorry but I don't have any of those titles.

Doug

--------------------
I think there's room for just one more film.....

 |  IP: Logged

Douglas Meltzer
Moderator

Posts: 4554
From: New York, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted June 13, 2009 11:03 AM      Profile for Douglas Meltzer   Email Douglas Meltzer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I finally got the 400' version. To answer Marshall's question, the shot of Inspector Krogh's arm being torn off by the monster is included, but the backstory isn't. We have no idea that this is the second time this has happened to poor Krogh.

Doug

--------------------
I think there's room for just one more film.....

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2