8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » Of Film layers and incorrect theories on fading?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Of Film layers and incorrect theories on fading?
Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted May 17, 2014 01:19 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have a question that has bothered me for awhile, and, happily admitting that I don't know everything about super 8 optical sound (and this would apply to ANY optical sound film, 16MM
ect)

... I have heard that when they produced super 8 optical sound, they actually did two "passes" on the film.

1. To print the image on the film.
2. To place on the optical track.

Now, I have noticed on the few prints that I have, that have color fade, most of them have a perfectly black optical track, while the image is faded.

I have also heard that a "fixative" of some form is used to make sure that the optical track does not fade, which seems to have worked brilliantly.

I have also noted that as the very edge of the image (next to the optical track), there is the slightest bit of the image that has absolutely perfect color, which I believe is because the fixative used for the optical track comes over slightly onto the very edge of the image.

So, my questions are two fold ...

1. Could the image, that has faded, be due NOT to film layers fading, but instead, of the final fixative place on the top of the image.

2. If so ... (referring to question 1#), could that faulty fixative be ...

a. Replaced
b. be somehow renewed, thereby returning the original color to the printed film, which may still exist under that fixative layer?

In other words, could much of the fading on faded print, not be due to a specific color layer, or any layer but instead, to a bad "protective/fixative" layer on the top?

This is a curiosity that has been perked by none other than my "Grizzly Adams" print that, while the image is faded, the optical track is pristine and, there is the slightest bit on the edge of the frame/image, where the color is absolutely perfect. This is in fact, the sole reason WHY this question has come up.

If the color on the very edge of the frame is spot on, and the rest, faded, is this because of, not layers fading, but the fixative/protective used to finish the print?

I thank you for your time and the expected info!

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged

Maurizio Di Cintio
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 977
From: Ortona, Italy
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted May 18, 2014 03:53 AM      Profile for Maurizio Di Cintio     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Or perhaps there is no fixative on the film other than on the optical soundtrack area: this would account for the tiny fraction of image being perfect in color right on the edge next to the soundtrack IMHO. Fact is this is the first time I heard about such fixative... Surely the more experienced forum memebers can clarify...

--------------------
Maurizio

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Arpin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 953
From: Sunland, CA, USA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted May 18, 2014 10:23 AM      Profile for Larry Arpin   Author's Homepage   Email Larry Arpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had a faded print with a tape splice and the part where the tape was had good color. But it too eventually faded. All film goes through a fix bath as part of the developing process. Optical soundtracks are applicated to give better sound. Not sure what the liquid is but without it the sound would not be good.

 |  IP: Logged

Allan Broadfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 452
From: Bromley, Kent
Registered: Nov 2010


 - posted May 18, 2014 05:03 PM      Profile for Allan Broadfield   Author's Homepage   Email Allan Broadfield   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Back in the days of silver optical tracks, after the image on the film had been fixed the optical sound section was re-developed by laying on it a thick bead of applicator fluid which re-developed it bringing it back to a silver image, which was needed to give it contrast and maximum frequency response. This is possibly the reason that any other image caught in that section has retained it's colour.

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted May 19, 2014 12:56 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hmmmm ...

Now we might be getting somewhere!

If I can discover what the exact fixative was , perhaps, with some unwanted optical super 8 ashort I have, try an experiment to run it through, as the correct amount of time through a fixative, and see what happens, as I have always found it rather odd that usually the cyan level disappears rather quickly.

Perhaps that "reddish" hue to those ole films can be due to a fixative, the fixative itself being the "reddish" culprit and not the film stock itself ...

however, even that "theory itself I have to call into question as, when old Eastman film stock reaches it's total and complete death (from what I understand, as I have never actually witnessed it), EVERYTHING is reddish and if left for a long enough time, the film would actually turn white? (I mean, no image left period))

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged

David M. Ballew
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 113
From: Burbank, CA USA
Registered: Nov 2009


 - posted May 19, 2014 03:15 PM      Profile for David M. Ballew   Email David M. Ballew   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Osi,

The question you raise brings to mind a common phenomenon in the world of 35mm projection that I think might provide a clue for part of the answer.

Sometimes one finds old policy or intermission loops that were projected at theatres for years on end, especially drive-ins. There will be catastrophic picture fade within a 1.85:1 area in the dead center of the full Academy frame, but absolutely vivid color and detail outside of that area. The area exposed to full-on lamphouse light through the widescreen aperture gets “bleached out,” as it were, but the portion of the frame shielded from light by the aperture plate remains nearly pristine. This is especially prevalent with ordinary photochemical prints, which are obviously light sensitive, but even sometimes happens with IB Technicolor. Even a medium as robust as IB Tech will apparently break down if you repeatedly zap it with bright enough light.

What I wonder is whether the sliver of pristine color on your prints is owing to the slightly reduced size of a Super 8 projector gate as opposed to a camera or printer gate. In my theory, the reason that sliver of picture and the optical soundtrack are pristine is that they never were exposed to the full-on blast of a projector bulb for repeated screenings. The sliver of picture might never have been hit with any light at all, and the soundtrack would have been hit with the relatively dim and fleeting light of an exciter lamp.

None of this is meant to rule out the possibility that chemical baths and processing peculiarities have played their part, too. I only mention this in hopes it brings you closer to an answer.

 |  IP: Logged

Allan Broadfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 452
From: Bromley, Kent
Registered: Nov 2010


 - posted May 19, 2014 04:42 PM      Profile for Allan Broadfield   Author's Homepage   Email Allan Broadfield   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Once the cyan and yellow layers have faded, that's that. With eastman colour prints the magenta is the most stable, other manufactured stocks may vary, but basically you're stuck with your red print.

 |  IP: Logged

Dominique De Bast
Film God

Posts: 4486
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Jun 2013


 - posted May 19, 2014 05:20 PM      Profile for Dominique De Bast   Email Dominique De Bast   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David, I remember that I readed it is not good for films to be exposed at an excessive projector light (but I don't know if the light or the heatness or both arms the stock). That was written in an article comparing filming at 18 fps and at 24 fps. One of the advantage of the second speed was that the film would stay less time exposed to the projector lamp. I don't know how scientific this advise was but it seems to go in the sense of your theory.

--------------------
Dominique

 |  IP: Logged

Allan Broadfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 452
From: Bromley, Kent
Registered: Nov 2010


 - posted May 20, 2014 02:18 AM      Profile for Allan Broadfield   Author's Homepage   Email Allan Broadfield   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The exposure to strong light obviously speeds up the process of fading. In the lab we used filters extensively for printing purposes and sometimes if neutral density filters etc. were in short supply we would print up our own using normal print stock, but this was only a shortstop measure as these would fade quite rapidly.

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted May 20, 2014 01:15 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Great posts folks. I had never thought of that a possibility (constant lamp exposure causing fading), it would be interesting if that is in fact, a fact ...

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2