8mm Forum: Close Encounters of the Third Kind feature

8mm Forum

my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home

next oldest topic

next newest topic

»	8mm Forum » 8mm Forum » Close Encounters of the Third Kind feature (Page 1)

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Author

Topic: Close Encounters of the Third Kind feature

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011

posted November 27, 2016 02:16 PM

Email Paul Browning

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

A long shot but i'll give it a go. I have always been curious has to how many own a copy of the feature, I do but would any of you guys come forward and say you do, I doubt it make much difference now as to whether the official numbers match what the actual count is, or will it be like the "x " files, where the truth is out there -----.

| IP: Logged

Tom Photiou
Film God

Posts: 4837
From: Plymouth U.K
Registered: Dec 2003

posted November 27, 2016 02:24 PM

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Unfortunatly i dont Paul, but i cannot believe i never bought one when i could, i watched this in the cinema 17 times when it was released. Several times i sat through the afternoon matinee and stayed for the tea time performance.
I suspect this would demand a nutty price way out of my range now,(and why not as there were only around 20 produced) Derann jumped the gun & sold copies before being given the go ahead by Columbia, they had to retract the sales or face losing the rights to all other Columbia 8mm titles they were doing. Hence why other titles in one of there catalogues didn't see the light of day.

| IP: Logged

David Watson
Film Handler

Posts: 93
From: United Kinddom
Registered: Mar 2013

posted November 27, 2016 02:50 PM

Email David Watson

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Hi Paul, I don't mind telling you I have a Derran full length copy of
Close encounters, You're Right it would be interesting to know how many copies are out there, I 've heard say 10 copies and then 12 copies and
even up to 20 copies ?? who really knows?.

| IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012

posted November 27, 2016 02:53 PM

Edit/Delete Post

Paul, I know of one other collector who has a print of this for sure besides yourself and David here.

I wish it was me but sadly this is not the case. [Smile]

[Smile]

[Wink]

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

| IP: Logged

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011

posted November 27, 2016 04:16 PM

Email Paul Browning

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Thanks David, two copies with Andrews known copy 3, Robert Tucker certainly had one earlier on in the year so perhaps 4, maybe he could confirm this. I read it was 20 David, but didn't Derann print side by side copies ?. So if we have 4 copies, that's 1/4 to David's quote, just 8 more to find.

| IP: Logged

Douglas Meltzer
Moderator

Posts: 4554
From: New York, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003

posted November 27, 2016 04:45 PM

Email Douglas Meltzer

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

I got my print in 2004. At the time I was told there were 10 prints in existence.

Doug

--------------------
I think there's room for just one more film.....

| IP: Logged

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011

posted November 28, 2016 10:07 AM

Email Paul Browning

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Thanks Doug. I now hear it could be as many as 26 copies !!!!.My count is now a tentative 6 copies, anyone else want to come forward, its a bit like the Elmo count we were doing some months ago but a lot less numbers, be good to find all these owners.

| IP: Logged

Melvin England
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 707
From: Hull, East Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Feb 2016

posted November 28, 2016 11:08 AM

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Were these prints all cinemascope or flat, or a mixture of both?

--------------------
"My name is for my friends!"

| IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005

posted November 28, 2016 11:27 AM

Author's Homepage

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

If there are ten copies as of when Doug bought his, then there is at least 11, as I have a copy, but my copy is NOT the Derann release! It's a super 8 scope feature, but it's the 1977 version and not the 1980 re-issue "Special Edition", (which is great as well).

There has been much speculation as to exactly WHERE this 1977 version actually came from, and i don't think we'll ever really know, but it's on low fade film stcoks as well. here is a link to a youtube video of some of the last reel that I put up on, well, youtube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSct449Ygh4

BTW, my apologies, when I did this video, I must have had the the speed at about 26 or so seconds, a little fast. The sound on this print was very good as well, though mono.

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

| IP: Logged

Mike Newell
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 826
From: United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2003

posted November 28, 2016 12:30 PM

Author's Homepage

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

I know of three copies of Close Encounters in Northern Ireland.

One collector is now dead I am not sure if it was resold or son kept collection.
Another copy the collector sold up to go digital print was offered to me but not my taste I believe it was either sold on to another collector or exchanged with Derann for DVD projector.

The last print is still with a film collector who is still active.

There is definitely more than 12 around. A lot were pre sold to collectors before the title was widely announced. The exact figures will never be known realistically who is going to publicise they have title. It was also rumoured you could still get the title after Derann ceased to supply if you were prepared to pay.

| IP: Logged

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011

posted November 28, 2016 01:39 PM

Email Paul Browning

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Thanks Mike. Why would it be shrouded in secrecy after 40 years is beyond my comprehension really. I would have thought the collectors would have been proud to say they had a copy, maybe that's just me. So that's 9 + osi's odd ball one, from a source truly out of the unknown. Well it was 3 Sunday night, were up to 10 now, that's a good response I think, keep um coming guys.

| IP: Logged

Mike Newell
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 826
From: United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2003

posted November 28, 2016 03:33 PM

Author's Homepage

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Paul , I would suspect that some of the collectors would stil be worried about declaring their ownership because of copyright. The reason why Close Enciounter didn't continue to be an official release was that they didn't have copyright or rights to issue and they received stern instructions from either Columbia or Spielberg's lawyers to discontinue , return all negatives and prints. Whether they had to pay compensation who knows. I think there was also a warning do this again and we will be back to bankrupt you and try and see if we can get you some jail time. The prints that got out were a bit like the Hardy Kruger film " The Ones that Got Away" Rumours always circulated that our European cousins who seem to be the only real source for negatives these day could supply a print but with striping and English conversion it may be in the same price range or more as the much talked about well worn Terminator II .

| IP: Logged

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011

posted November 28, 2016 03:44 PM

Email Paul Browning

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Good point Mike. So if any one wants to pm if there worried about a knock on the door please do. I imagine the film companies would be more busy chasing the real pirates and boot legers of dvd to be interested in a few copies of this film, but I guess if they can make an example of someone they would.

| IP: Logged

Mike Newell
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 826
From: United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2003

posted November 28, 2016 04:13 PM

Author's Homepage

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Paul, I would totally agree with you in the points you stated but the same thing could have been said when the 8mm release was issued yet they came down hard. Creative ownership more than the money involved would seem to be the issue.

| IP: Logged

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011

posted November 28, 2016 04:55 PM

Email Paul Browning

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

I'm intrigued Mike, did Derann seek retrospective permission to print this after they had made the necessary negs to print from and run them off first, because ifs that's the case, I'd be pissed off too, or was it the work of a jobsworth ?.

| IP: Logged

Mike Newell
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 826
From: United Kingdom
Registered: Jun 2003

posted November 28, 2016 05:04 PM

Author's Homepage

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Paul from what I was told I think they thought they had a deal with Columbia to release and were fine. They were open about doing it and advertised the release. The Spielberg element seems to have created contractual problems and that caused the issue.

| IP: Logged

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011

posted November 28, 2016 05:37 PM

Email Paul Browning

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Thanks Mike, that explains it now.

| IP: Logged

Rob Young.
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1633
From: Cheshire, U.K.
Registered: Dec 2003

posted November 29, 2016 02:37 AM

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

My understanding of it is this...

Rights obtained from Columbia to issue super 8 prints (so they are perfectly legal). In fact it was a huge coup at the time. They were openly advertised and shown at Blackpool.

Rep from Columbia pays unannounced visit to Derann (or the lab) and sees 16mm prints are being struck from the 16mm negative...

End of Columbia contract... naughty, naughty [Eek!]

[Eek!]

| IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012

posted November 29, 2016 02:47 AM

Edit/Delete Post

Yes it's a shame that occasionally we hear of stories where trust has been broken with these things.

Had greed not had reared its ugly head at times, I'm certain a completely trustworthy arrangement between any two parties, would have paid higher dividends overall.

Well certainly for us lot now,it may of done.

Still, we can't grumble I suppose. [Wink]

[Wink]

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

| IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005

posted November 29, 2016 11:07 AM

Author's Homepage

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

AHHHHH, but we can cherish finding those rare prints, eh? [Big Grin]

[Big Grin]

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

| IP: Logged

Paul Browning
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1006
From: West Midlands United Kingdom
Registered: Aug 2011

posted November 29, 2016 12:33 PM

Email Paul Browning

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Yes Osi, we can celebrate finding those rare prints, as long as you don't own up to it. I thought I was clear about this, and now Rob throws a swerve ball in, are you saying rob that the film are legal to own on super 8, but no permission was given for the 16 mm print to be made, and so any prints from the negative must be destroyed?.

| IP: Logged

Rob Young.
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1633
From: Cheshire, U.K.
Registered: Dec 2003

posted November 29, 2016 01:12 PM

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Yes, Paul, the super 8 Derann prints were legal as far as I am aware.

Film for the Collector ran at the very least full page teasers for it (I'm away this week, but can look this up and post next week).

Derann presented this feature (the special edition version) at one of the spring Blackpool film fayres.

Certainly this was not the same approach as selling the "import" or "specials".

It was very much advertised for sale.

And they certainly had a Columbia deal at the time.

So, my sources tell me that the reason this totally legit release fell apart was indeed because "knock off" 16mm prints were also being produced...and they were found out.

End of deal.

Actually, the consequences could have been much worse.

I know some people "in the know" can back me up here, and since this matter was settled between Derann and Columbia, and the former is long gone, it doesn't really matter any longer if anyone cares to add to this discussion...but suffice to say that your super 8 Derann prints were purchased in good faith and are safe.

The only reason the legit super 8 prints are limited is because the big D were naughty boys and had the plug pulled.

BUT, now, if you have gone to the trouble of producing a 16mm negative for a super 8 release of a big James C movie and then the distributor which you have the deal with goes bust (hello, "Carrolco")...do you bin the neg or print some "imports"...???

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Wink]

[Wink]

[Wink]

| IP: Logged

Michael O'Regan
Film God

Posts: 3085
From: Essex, UK
Registered: Oct 2007

posted November 29, 2016 01:23 PM

Email Michael O'Regan

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

quote:
Film for the Collector ran at the very least full page teasers for it (I'm away this week, but can look this up and post next week).

Derann presented this feature (the special edition version) at one of the spring Blackpool film fayres.

Yes, I'm holding in my hand right now the March 1990 issue which has a full page ad, selling the Stereo Sound Version at £346.99.
In the same issue is the advert for Blackpool and the "8mm World Premiere" for the film.

| IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012

posted November 29, 2016 01:32 PM

Edit/Delete Post

What number is that one Michael, I will see if I have a copy?

Somewhere around 18 - 20 I'm guessing??

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

| IP: Logged

David Hardy
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 955
From: Johnshaven Village , Montrose, Scotland
Registered: Jan 2015

posted November 29, 2016 01:39 PM

Send New Private Message

Edit/Delete Post

Andrew its FFTC # 15. [Smile]

[Smile]

--------------------
" My equipment's more important than your rats. "

| IP: Logged

All times are Central

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Move Topic

Delete Topic

next oldest topic

next newest topic

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

UBB.classic^TM 6.3.1.2