Author
|
Topic: Request: Fixing sound sync on a couple Derann Disney shorts
|
|
|
|
|
Maurizio Di Cintio
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 977
From: Ortona, Italy
Registered: Jan 2004
|
posted May 11, 2018 08:18 AM
So, if I got it right, you do not want to lift the sound from a DVD and transfer it onto your prints because the DVD sound quality is worse than the S/8 prints??!!! Regardless, lifting the sound from the prints, re-sync it and retransfer it is certainly feasible, but you need a quartzed projector for absolute consistent speed throughout the whole process; this will ensure absence of sound drifting and/or wow of any kind from start to finish. Using a quartzed GS 1200 will also ensure you get no mechanical interference from the claw movement (some Sankyo’s are famous for this), because GS have an extra rubber roller before the sound chute, isolating film from all residual vibrations. In any case the resulting sound quality will be a little lower than before the process since it always more than one generation. This, however should be hardly perceivable, and will be mainly noticeable with a slight increase in background hissing noise. If you want, I can do this job for you: it will take about 1 hr and a half included final check for the whole duration of the films (assuming they are on 2 200’ spools). PM me if interested. Kindest regards.
-------------------- Maurizio
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Maurizio Di Cintio
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 977
From: Ortona, Italy
Registered: Jan 2004
|
posted May 11, 2018 04:06 PM
Of course he can have a try. Problem is according to my experience (and I have redubbed dozens of prints ranging from a few minutes to hours’ duration), you can never rest on the laurels when it comes to syncing. Before switching to an Elmo GS with sync (quartz) box, I used different machines to re-dub features and my own films. I did all sorts of things, trial and error and believe me any projector that is not quartzed WILL actually go out of sync at some point: it’s not a matter of “if”, it’s a matter of “when” ; and it may weel be under 3 minutes. So yes this guy can have a try and be successful… What if he isn’t? He’ll have destroyed the most convenient source material he could use; of course he’ll still have a copy saved on his computer, but taken from his Sankyo (which are excellent machines but not more speed-consistent than others), thus affected by imperceptible fluctuations that will probably make it impossible to re-sync unless you undertake a conspicuous job of “stretch & push” said material. Not the best of scenarios. AND time-consuming. And yes, maybe there is no lip-sync requirements but what if there is a sudden and short noise, like a heavy object being dropped? That requires frame accurate syncing. The system used by people who have been doing this kind of job for years now, is such that if the workflow is THE right one, you’ll have a spot – on sync in cases such as the above-mentioned example: no need to alter the speed with a trimmer (which Sankyo’s only have in the innards), no resulting wow, no need to go back and correct the mistake… No possible damage to film. The film is screened three times for: 1) Digital capture to computer 2) Transfer back to film after the necessary alterations have been done 3) Final check for the entire duration of the film What I mean with alteration in THIS case is very easy: unlocking the sound from the images on NLE and move the former ones so that eventually they’ll match with the latter ones. Other systems are – to me – a gamble: he might be successful (as per usual gambles) or regret going the easy way. Of course the choice is his very own, but it should be based on information as complete as possible.
-------------------- Maurizio
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|