Posts: 318
From: Burnaby, B.C. Canada
Registered: Feb 2017
posted December 16, 2017 07:10 PM
I bought the 4 X 400' flat release earlier this year and it is faded and grainy as Kurt described. I just recently acquired the digest originally reviewed by Andrew. What a difference with both the low fade stock and scope presentation! If only more Hammer classics were released in such glory!
Posts: 4837
From: Plymouth U.K
Registered: Dec 2003
posted December 19, 2017 12:33 AM
Burton, those are excellent screenshots. We also have this digest in scope on low fade stock and it is a good edit. The classicc flash back opening and then more or less moves along very quickly.
Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004
posted December 19, 2017 02:51 PM
Burton/Tom - You're fortunate to find copies looking so good. Prior to obtaining the scope feature, I had a couple of digests but neither was worth keeping. One was 1980s low fade but even that was a washed out overexposed print!
Posts: 3216
From: The Projection Box
Registered: Nov 2006
posted March 14, 2019 03:06 AM
Worth mentioning on this thread.
Recently acquired a LPP Scope 400 of this and also a new Fuji print of the flat version both excellent, but I do find the Fuji print with more vivid colour. Probably one of the best 400s out there.
Posts: 958
From: Elkins Park, PA, USA
Registered: Jun 2012
posted March 17, 2019 09:53 AM
Yes get the feature! Its a real nice scope print! It was so good I took mine and mounted it on one reel! Its nothing like it!