8mm Forum: Rocky Mountain Lab is in TV News for bad activity

»	8mm Forum » General Yak » Rocky Mountain Lab is in TV News for bad activity

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!

Author

Topic: Rocky Mountain Lab is in TV News for bad activity

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003

posted June 12, 2010 12:42 AM

After hundreds of complaints throughout the internet, finally the used-to-well-known lab is in the TV news for its bad activity:

http://www.9news.com/rss/article.aspx?storyid=138875

too bad!

--------------------
Winbert

| IP: Logged

Claus Harding
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1149
From: Washington DC
Registered: Oct 2006

posted June 12, 2010 11:45 AM

This is really too bad; I didn't know that Rocky Mountain had a reputation for poor business practices.
In the back of my mind, they were always there as "the place I may never need, but if I do, they will be the one place that can do it" but it sounds like there is a big barrel of worms here. I wonder what the facts are?

Claus.

--------------------
"Why are there shots of deserts in a scene that's supposed to take place in Belgium during the winter?" (Review of 'Battle of the Bulge'.)

| IP: Logged

Simon Wyss
Film Handler

Posts: 78
From: Äsch, Switzerland
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 28, 2010 01:13 PM

I have sent footage to Rocky Mountain Lab and never received anything back, not even a reply to my several Mails and phone calls. That was three years ago. I have had a lab myself. This is unexcusable.

| IP: Logged

Bill Brandenstein
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1632
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007

posted July 28, 2010 06:41 PM

If the IRS has seized their assets (which is a rumor) then everyone's film is in the hands of the government, who is supposed to be sorting out a royal mess. Except that they'll liquidate those assets for pennies on the dollar, if that. Anyway, the lab may have been in trouble for a lot longer than anyone knew.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central

Printer-friendly view of this topic

UBB.classic^TM 6.3.1.2