Posts: 815
From: Berlin, Germany, Europe, Earth, Solar System
Registered: Apr 2006
posted April 06, 2010 04:20 AM
Hi,
* at least some Super8-b&w-films (Stan & Ollie, Charlie Chaplin, ...) have been printed onto colour-stock and hence became reddish by now. * I've got one colour-print that faded/turned red so badly that it looks like a reddish-toned b&w-print when projected. (UFA, "Stoßgebet für einen Hammer") * there have been some Super8-b&w-films that have been "toned". Your "brownish" sounds like "sepia" which is more or less a standard and hence even available as an extra mode in most digital still/video-cams: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sepia_tone#Sepia_toning
Posts: 963
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Feb 2006
posted April 06, 2010 06:48 AM
Winbert, for a time the price of silver made the cost of B & W film stock more expensive than colour. Many companies then began releasing their B & W films on colour stock to save costs.
Scratches in the emulsion would appear green!
I have a red faded Birth Of A Nation; such a shame.
Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003
posted April 06, 2010 06:50 AM
Hi JOerg
Yes exactly, my print is "sepia". I have read through your link but still cannot get the idea to what is the benefit to make a sepia print. Could you elaborate for me please?
Posts: 815
From: Berlin, Germany, Europe, Earth, Solar System
Registered: Apr 2006
posted April 06, 2010 10:59 AM
quote: what is the benefit to make a sepia print
The benefit is that the print is now sepia toned
There's no real reason for this for a commercial print of a non-experimental movie - except for the fact that some people prefer sepia over "real" b&w (as it looks less harsh) and that most people think that sepia looks "old / ancient" while b&w looks "contemporary".
There's still a slight chance that it's an unwanted effect caused by the used film-stock: E.g. some of the Orwo-reversal-b&w-stock are reported to have a slight blueish cast.