Author
|
Topic: ST1200 scratching films
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Woodcock
Film God
Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012
|
posted June 18, 2014 04:03 AM
The two small rollers mounted above the feed sprocket on the ST1200's are an absolute nightmare design for scratching films on these models. I have had 5 of these machines over the years, including all of the different variants,hoping that one would at least be totally kind to film. None of them have ever totally succeeded.
The best, I have found, is the earliest standard ST1200 models with the steel, silver coloured rollers. They seem to continue to turn (as designed) much longer after the later inferior white nylon ones stop turning. Once this is the case, the film almost always gets scratched! All you can do to at least give yourself a fighting chance, is:- 1/ Take the assembly around the top sprocket completely apart and clean everything meticulously. 2/ Lubricate the inner bore of eack roller with a very small amount of light machine oil (3in1 is good). 3/ Ensure that when rebuilding the assembly, the rollers are placed the right way round, this is obvious when you look at the alignment of the protruding tracks.Many of these have been tampered with over the years and I have found that when I first obtain the machine, the rollers have indeed been put back incorrectly meaning the roller tracks actually enter into the film frame area and mis-align against the stationary green guide tracks beneath...in this instance the conclusion is instant scratching!
Once all the above has been carried out, at least then your rollers should turn when film is sandwiched between the sprocket teeth and the rollers tracks as per design spec. You then stand half a chance of at least getting a feature through one of these, relatively unscathed, while ever the rollers continue to turn.
Bear in mind however, this is not the one and only place these machines CAN scratch film, just the most common by far. Very poor design indeed regarding the auto threading guides. [ June 18, 2014, 09:19 AM: Message edited by: Andrew Woodcock ]
-------------------- "C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Woodcock
Film God
Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012
|
posted December 27, 2014 07:09 PM
You pay the best part of £800 even now for anything worth having, and Paul states you can never be lax?
Well I'm sorry, I truly love the hobby, but if I had to live in a surgeons theatre in a constant state of fear of wrecking my entire Super 8mm film collection all for the sake of tolerating a noisy old scratching GS..... then it would have to go for a second time around, hobby or no hobby I'm afraid!
Thank God there are more practical alternatives that I have found, or else, no doubt, this would be the second time for selling all that I have that would still be remotely of any value!!
When I was a youngster, I used to dream of owning a GS 1200, luckily I never went down that road!
For the life of me, I have never understood why these machines are rated so highly without trying the rest, given all of their major flaws????
In this day and age, who needs pulse sync anyhow? All synchronization issues can be more than catered for using modern digital video software. [ December 28, 2014, 12:17 PM: Message edited by: Andrew Woodcock ]
-------------------- "C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|