This is topic Do We Want 16mm Quality On Dvd's ? in forum General Yak at 8mm Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://8mmforum.film-tech.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=004557

Posted by Melvin England (Member # 5270) on November 03, 2017, 11:43 AM:
 
An unusual subject so I shall explain.....

I have just watched the John Huston version of "Moulin Rouge" on dvd starring Jose Ferrer and Zsa Zsa Gabor. The dvd was released through Wienerworld and was a region 0 disc.
The transfer was completely unmastered. Lots of speckled scratches and an audibly crackly mono soundtrack. It appears to have not been colour corrected either, as, if I had been selling this as an 8mm or 16mm film, I would have had to describe it as "colours starting to fade and has a pink hue to it."
It also did appear to have come from a 16mm copy as it just has that "feel" to it that "image quality" that told you is wasn't 35mm.

Looking at it in one way, it was kind of uplifting to watch a film with that "celluloid" feel to it, together with the shortcomings we are facing nowadays,as film collectors, with fading colour prints, even though it was dvd.

On the other hand.....Should 16mm images be left only in the celluloid format? Due of the level of technology that video/dvd is at nowadays, should our expectations be to only accept remastered sound and picture quality from 35mm or 70mm prints for dvd to gain the highest possible transfer quality, and accept no less?

Colleagues...... I await your responses.

.
 
Posted by Osi Osgood (Member # 424) on November 03, 2017, 12:10 PM:
 
If the film was originally shot on 16MM than yeah, sure (as in the beatles "Magical Mystery Tour", which looks incredible for a 50 year old film shot on 16MM or, from what I understand, "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre"), otherwise, no, in my opinion. [Smile]
 
Posted by Melvin England (Member # 5270) on November 03, 2017, 01:18 PM:
 
Yes,of course Osi, not withstanding those that were actually shot on 16mm!
 
Posted by Brian Fretwell (Member # 4302) on November 03, 2017, 03:57 PM:
 
I would like to see El Mariachi on DVD or Blu Ray from the 16mm negatives. The DVD I have is from a 35mm blow up print and as the director says the colour and contrast are not as good as the telecine of the negatives he used for test editing - sequrence of this is on the DVD.
 
Posted by Adrian Winchester (Member # 248) on November 05, 2017, 12:21 AM:
 
I'd say it partly depends on what's available. E.g. last year a community cinema in Croydon that I'm involved presented a rare screening of a 1957 British Rank production 'The Bolshoi Ballet', with a short talk, to mark the 50th anniversary of when half the film was filmed at a former Croydon theatre. We found it's virtually a lost film in the UK, and the only means of showing it was via a German DVD release. Gaining the rights was another saga in itself. It was obvious that the master had been a 16mm print and we gave some thought to whether we should screen it, especially as we would only normally contemplate DVD as a last resort. But we decided that the picture would be acceptable and the evening was a great success. Demand for tickets meant we had to organise a second screening. Ironically, the grain evident from the 16mm print made it look, in a way, more cinematic and less 'digital' than if a pristine transfer from 35mm had existed!
 
Posted by Tom Photiou (Member # 130) on November 05, 2017, 03:10 AM:
 
A of DVD's were straight transfers from video sources. Not so much, but in the early days of DVD's they were just releasing everything just to get it out there on disc and pull in the profits, i learned this very quickly in the early years of DVD so i soon learned to read up about the disc's releases before buying to ensure it was always a restored or remastered version.
Especially on the older films, Osi, you are correct, TCSM was shot on 16mm, there certainly nothing wrong with anything shot on 16, a lot of TV series were shot this way and we have just bought a mint A1 copy of an episode of the Professionals and its every bit as good as any major movie ive seen. [Wink]
 
Posted by Bill Brandenstein (Member # 892) on November 10, 2017, 08:28 PM:
 
There's a big difference between what Melvin saw (a worn and faded release print) and responsibly archived source materials. The only time I've seen worn release prints used for video transfers were public domain or renegade knock-off videos. I know there are other ones in the rare instance where master materials are lost. 16mm to DVD or HD is great if that's what you're SUPPOSED to be seeing, not if it's just what happened to be lying around.
 
Posted by David Hardy (Member # 4628) on November 19, 2017, 04:59 AM:
 
The lesson to be learned is that if you want that 16mm or even 8mm 'filmic look' is don't buy a DVD or Blu-Ray that has been digitally remastered or restored to much.

I found this out for myself years ago when i replaced an old set of the Dollar Films Trilogy with the new digitally remastered transfers. I found i liked the un-remastered transfers more as they looked more like a 16mm film print.
[Wink] [Wink] [Wink]
 
Posted by Claus Harding (Member # 702) on November 19, 2017, 10:28 AM:
 
If you want an example of what a film shot on 16mm can look like on Blu-Ray, look for "The Rum Diary" with Johnny Depp. It was shot in Super-16mm by Dariusz Wolski, and is gloriously vibrant and sharp:

 -

C.
 


Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2