Author
|
Topic: New Super 8 64T Results
|
Simon McConway
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1085
From: Doncaster, UK
Registered: Jun 2004
|
posted February 23, 2006 12:53 PM
Well, after over 4 months, The Widescreen Centre have returned the film. They expect future films not to take as long, they say! This was, in fact, the processing companies first attempt at the processing.
Anyway, I tested the film with a Canon 814E & 310XL. Both exposed the film fine, but with the 814E doing the best job. At this point, I thought that the film was far too grainy, especially inside shots. My final shots were taken with a Bell & Howell 2146 & Canon 1014. Strangely, these cameras lessened the grain to a perfectly acceptable level. The Canon 1014E gave the best results, as you would expect. I adjusted the 1014 (via the rotary control) to give roughly +1 stop more exposure. These results were spot on perfect with the previous to adjusting results still being very good.
To sum up, not one camera over or under-exposed the film. The Canon 1014 was best. Inside shots are more grainy, but where cameras are adjustable, I believe that this is curable. Picture steadiness was exact; no jitter as I've heard about previously.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|