This is topic A new price record for "Blues Brother" (2 x 400') in forum 8mm Forum at 8mm Forum.
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://8mmforum.film-tech.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=007813
Posted by Winbert Hutahaean (Member # 58) on January 13, 2013, 06:23 PM:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/221174686644
Sold for $405!
I knew the seller is one of us. Congratulation!.
The seller was very honest by providing a clip that showing the film has faded but bidders were really crazy.
This film is one of the title I bought from Trevor Addams when he decided to clear out his collection. If I could reach this sell only, I would have recovered from all the cost I spent to buy his all films!
Again congratulation!
Posted by Osi Osgood (Member # 424) on January 13, 2013, 06:31 PM:
Good heavens! ... and people complain about spending 300.00 for a Wolfman?
Posted by Winbert Hutahaean (Member # 58) on January 13, 2013, 06:36 PM:
That's obviously different case Osi.
Your Wolfman may not of interest many people.
Posted by Graham Sinden (Member # 431) on January 13, 2013, 06:46 PM:
Is this a joke. The film has hardly any colour left!!
Unless the camera used makes it look a lot worse than it really is.
Graham S
Posted by Mark Todd (Member # 96) on January 13, 2013, 06:51 PM:
I could`nt bring myself to charge the buyer anywhere near that whatever it ended at.
I`d have to just charge them what I thought it was really worth, plus a few bob to cover the extra fees.
Getting a bit silly sometimes these days really.
Best Mark.
Posted by Winbert Hutahaean (Member # 58) on January 13, 2013, 06:52 PM:
quote:
Unless the camera used makes it look a lot worse than it really is.
No Graham, the seller is very honest. He clearly stated "Color - Faded".
This is a new record, anyone try his luck now...?
Posted by Tony Stucchio (Member # 519) on January 13, 2013, 07:28 PM:
You could probably get it in full-length on 16mm for that price.
Posted by Hugh Thompson Scott (Member # 2922) on January 13, 2013, 07:28 PM:
Just goes to show some people have too much money.It's red, and
that's going.
Posted by Adrian Winchester (Member # 248) on January 14, 2013, 06:31 PM:
Incredible - I'd guess the original boxes were significant as I can't image the buyer will want to watch the film often. And the fade - as with many U8 releases - really is bad, with that murky no contrast look. I must check if my copy,unfortunately not in original boxes, is as bad.
Posted by Winbert Hutahaean (Member # 58) on January 14, 2013, 06:47 PM:
I get a confirmation from the seller that the films have been shipped. So the buyer is legit.
Posted by Gerald Santana (Member # 2362) on January 14, 2013, 06:50 PM:
I had a chance to take a look at this copy, it looked pretty good to me, fair color -- not red. The screen shots are here on this review:
http://8mmforum.film-tech.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=4;t=000276#000000
Posted by Hugh Thompson Scott (Member # 2922) on January 14, 2013, 06:55 PM:
To pay that kind of money for 32 minutes of red tape, more money
than sense and head examined fit into a sentence.I'm sure that
title could be picked up cheaper and with better print.
To be fair though, a lot of the U8 stuff always had that magenta
cast, not all, but a good many, but it still looks red.
Posted by Mark Todd (Member # 96) on January 14, 2013, 08:25 PM:
Its almost a give away item really. we`ve all given better things away over the years I`m sure.
You can get the Blue ray for $10 or less new in the states for the whole film so its nuts really.
Ebay doesnt` find the value of a thing, it often inflates it for various psychological related reasons.
Looking at the clip I`d think its a pretty sure bet the buyer will be a bit dissapointed when they actually run it, if thats what its been bought for.
Best Mark.
Posted by Michael Beyer (Member # 1143) on January 15, 2013, 06:19 AM:
Wooow...then a big congratulation to the seller
It will never buy this item, because nearly all the great songs aren't on this digest.
Posted by Hugh Thompson Scott (Member # 2922) on January 15, 2013, 06:39 AM:
Reading the previous discussion on the film "Blues Brothers", I'm
suprised nobody has mentioned the obvious solution that U8
could have taken, and that would have been to issue a seperate
spool of music numbers.They did a seperate promo for "Dracula"
that could be intercut with the 2x400,the same thing could have been done with this, so appeasing both camps.
Posted by Winbert Hutahaean (Member # 58) on January 15, 2013, 01:41 PM:
quote:
Looking at the clip I`d think its a pretty sure bet the buyer will be a bit dissapointed when they actually run it
Guys,
When I started this thread I, with an intention, let you know that the seller is one of us. I did not reveal the name until the said seller come forward by him/herself.
My intention is only to share the joy with the seller. He (or she) was the lucky one and the buyer knew exactly what he/she bought because the condition of film was clearly mentioned in the description as faded and not only screen shot was provided but even a clip was there.
Why the buyer still bid high...that was the buyer's discretion. I just want to share the joy and no need to question "Why it was sold".
Who never know if the buyer was a lawyer or an artist which can get $500 in an hour, so buying this much is just like buying peanuts. We never know.
If I ever sold that high I would be joyful too and share with you.
cheers,
Posted by Oscar Iniesta (Member # 1731) on January 15, 2013, 02:04 PM:
I follow this auction for a time. But the price was too high for a faded print. You never know who is the buyer. Maybe a Blues Brothers fan with a lot of money. Maybe a new rich collector who doesn“t know what is a digest, what is a feature film, and nothing about film conditions.
About Wolfman, it is a clear example of collecting. We buy the things we like or love. I love the films I watch in the 80“s and some others. I know classics are classics, but a stupid film can make you feel happy every time you project it. Sometimes that film is a classic and sometimes is a Z movie.
Posted by Michael O'Regan (Member # 938) on January 15, 2013, 02:23 PM:
Don't forget folks, there wasn't just the winner that bid high for this. The price was raised pretty high by other bidders.
Posted by Tom Photiou (Member # 130) on January 15, 2013, 02:57 PM:
This is where the hobby becomes a farce, no matter how good the origianl boxes are if the film has faded and is just 35 minuites a good box does nothing, clearly another buyer who doesnt know that dealers still exist, however, i have to say well done that man and if i could get this sort of money for all my double albums etc i'd sell tomorrow, it does begger belief but well done that seller
I do suspect if the buyer has a shed load of dosh surly they would be projecting other formats including the excellent Blu-ray for a fraction of the price, Dam i knew i should have a copy of this when it was £30 on Deranns list
Posted by Graham Ritchie (Member # 559) on January 15, 2013, 06:37 PM:
I better not tell my wife the prices some of those films are being sold for....she would say...SELL..SELL..SELL
Graham
Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2