This is topic Dark angles on Heurtier in forum 16mm Forum at 8mm Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://8mmforum.film-tech.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=5;t=001061

Posted by Luigi Castellitto (Member # 3759) on January 08, 2014, 04:12 PM:
 
I had never tried a 16 mm film on my Heurtier tri-format 53 projector, only 9.5 mm and 8 mm, and there were no problems.
Now I have noticed these dark corners with a 16mm film, the objective is to blame? It would take a greater wide?
The cloth where I projected had some bends, but I tried to project from various angles and distant (but not more than 2m, I have no space), nothin..., corners of film, right side above all, remain dark.

 -
 
Posted by Luigi Castellitto (Member # 3759) on January 14, 2014, 12:10 PM:
 
No one?
But... I can change lens at Heurtier tri-format 53?
 
Posted by Paul Mason (Member # 4015) on January 17, 2014, 05:31 AM:
 
I've no experience with the Heurtier Tr-Gauge projector but it looks to me like the wrong lens or the lamp or condenser is out of adjustment. A dichroic mirror lamp does not require a condenser of course.
 
Posted by Luigi Castellitto (Member # 3759) on January 17, 2014, 06:53 AM:
 
I think that's the lens, because with the 8mm and 9.5mm films all goes well, the picture is complete.
I have a on Heurtier an Angeniuex F 20 - 1:1,5
Means that "not enough" for 16mm and, instead, is good for 8mm and 9.5mm?
How do I know? Indeed, the lens where the lens attaches is smaller than the 16mm frame...
 
Posted by Maurice Leakey (Member # 916) on January 17, 2014, 10:32 AM:
 
Grahame Newnham's 9.5mm site says that the Heurtier Supertri 53 (from 1953) uses a 110 volt lamp of 250/500 watts.
Perhaps this means that for 16mm films the projector needs the 500 watt lamp which would obviously have a larger filament than the 250 watt lamp.
The 500 watt lamp would then be able to fill the 16mm frame.
 
Posted by Dominique De Bast (Member # 3798) on January 17, 2014, 01:03 PM:
 
What is strange is that 9,5 and 16 mm have almost the same size as 9,5 has central perforations.
 
Posted by Luigi Castellitto (Member # 3759) on January 19, 2014, 10:13 AM:
 
Should I try a 500 watt lamp, but it is also true what he says Dom. I also feel free to contact Grahame.
 
Posted by Fabrizio Mosca (Member # 142) on January 19, 2014, 10:58 AM:
 
Luigi, try this to see if it's a topic of lamp or lens.
Remove the lens and run a film with lamp on. Looking through a pin-hole, try to see if there is the same effect on the frame that you notice on the screen.
It may be a problem of centering the condenser.
 
Posted by Luigi Castellitto (Member # 3759) on January 19, 2014, 11:24 AM:
 
Before doing this test, I ask you: if it was a problem of centering of condenser, it is normal that in 8mm and 9.5mm see, instead, all okay?
 
Posted by Fabrizio Mosca (Member # 142) on January 19, 2014, 11:43 AM:
 
Yes for 8mm, it depends for 9.5. It would be helpful if you can post a picture of 9.5, to see if there is a slight masking also on that format.
 
Posted by Luigi Castellitto (Member # 3759) on January 19, 2014, 01:38 PM:
 
So, I tried to take off the light for the projection and to keep on the "side light" that has the Heurtier, then I removed the lens during projection and I looked: the image is complete.
 
Posted by Fabrizio Mosca (Member # 142) on January 19, 2014, 03:09 PM:
 
Luigi, I've sent you a PM
 
Posted by Lee Mannering (Member # 728) on January 20, 2014, 07:49 AM:
 
Luigi. I had the large tri gauge with optical/magnetic sound for a number of years and it was a very solidly built machine although I never liked the inner lamp house design. Over the years I experienced shutter problems plus moving condenser issues the latter could also be your problem perhaps so I would look more in the lamp house than pointing the finger at the lens or the lamp perhaps.
 
Posted by Luigi Castellitto (Member # 3759) on January 20, 2014, 04:59 PM:
 
I do other tests and will update!
 
Posted by Luigi Castellitto (Member # 3759) on January 26, 2014, 07:02 AM:
 
After several tests and confirmation that the lamp is 500 watts, it is understood that the objective f 20mm is too "strange" for 9.5mm and 16mm, I need one that would prevent vignetting.
If anyone has suggestions on a compatible model so be it!
 


Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2