8mm Forum: Why a B&W print of a Color movie

This is topic Why a B&W print of a Color movie in forum 16mm Forum at 8mm Forum.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://8mmforum.film-tech.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=5;t=001625

Posted by Brad Kimball (Member # 5) on June 26, 2017, 12:48 AM:

Why would there even be black and white prints of color movies? To what purpose and why would I even want to consider buying it?

Posted by Brian Fretwell (Member # 4302) on June 26, 2017, 03:05 AM:

I can only think it was for cost. Also I know some TV programs made in colour had B&W prints made for exports to countries with only B&W TV so perhaps films were too and it is those prints you see.

Posted by Maurice Leakey (Member # 916) on June 26, 2017, 03:56 AM:

In the days of 16mm film libraries a hirer was often given the choice of colour or black & white for a feature film. Most people opted for the black & white copies as they were cheaper.
Mobile operator 16mm prints were always black & white.
Before television went into colour, 16mm black & white prints were always supplied to them.

Posted by Ricky Daniels (Member # 95) on June 26, 2017, 07:52 AM:

Absolutely spot on Maurice
[Wink]

Posted by Winbert Hutahaean (Member # 58) on June 26, 2017, 11:54 AM:

quote:
I can only think it was for cost.

But in the days of colour film (after 1980s)...the situation is the opposite, B/W films were printed on color stock due to the fact B/W stock were rarer and became more expensive.

So we got all L&H, Three stooges, etc on sephia tones....and I hate it!!

Posted by Tom Photiou (Member # 130) on June 26, 2017, 02:43 PM:

At least they wont fade. [Wink]

Posted by Joe Vannicola (Member # 4156) on July 03, 2017, 12:02 AM:

A few years ago, I purchased a black and white Castle Films version of Scrub Me Momma With A Boogie Beat at a film convention. While I would have preferred a Tech print of this cartoon, the black and white version was sufficient. I also bought a black and white print of All This And Rabbit Stew. My philosophy is: at least I have these cartoons in my film collection.

Posted by Brian Fretwell (Member # 4302) on July 03, 2017, 11:16 AM:

I image the change to using colour stock for B&W prints was due to the large increases in silver prices during the 1980's. It is all recovered during colour processing but a lot is still on the film base (creating the image) in real B&W prints.

Posted by David Ollerearnshaw (Member # 3296) on July 04, 2017, 08:17 AM:

Costs of black and white went up 25% and kept rising. Someone was speculating on the price of silver.
A true black and white films looks much better.

Posted by Maurice Leakey (Member # 916) on July 04, 2017, 03:22 PM:

It was the Hunt Brothers (Nelson & William), who in 1979, profited by an estimated $2 billion to $4 billion in silver speculation.

Posted by Mitchell Dvoskin (Member # 1183) on July 05, 2017, 12:10 PM:

Most B&W prints of color films were struck for television. In the USA, other than NBC that went full color in the late 1950's, the other major networks and almost all independent stations did not go full color until the late 1960's.

There were also B&W prints of color films struck for the home market, although those were generally condensed versions.

In 35mm, many Warner Brothers and MGM films were re-issued in B&W as a second feature for double features. In addition, many color films during WW2 were issued in B&W, as access to the chemicals needed to process color were not available for commercial use.

In 16mm, there were many illegal dupers out there who made unauthorized B&W copies for sale to collectors.

Posted by Brad Kimball (Member # 5) on July 11, 2017, 09:02 PM:

I see B&W prints of Hammer Horror classics from time to time and it just kills me why anyone would want to even consider buying a crappy dupe in monochrome of "Horror of Dracula" rather than hold out for a nice color print.

UBB.classic^TM 6.3.1.2