8mm Forum: Goldfinger IB Tech Print

This is topic Goldfinger IB Tech Print in forum 16mm films for sale/trade/wanted at 8mm Forum.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://8mmforum.film-tech.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=001566

Posted by Robert Tucker (Member # 386) on March 11, 2015, 08:58 PM:

I have just acquired another print of Goldfinger which is stunning in quality never been run and is in excellent mint condition, even more so then my Super 8 print i sold last year.

Will be listing this along with some other choice titles sometime this year so keep em peeled.

Posted by Simon McConway (Member # 219) on March 12, 2015, 05:30 AM:

Within the next 100 years, my GS will be up for sale. Keep an eye out!

Posted by Andrew Woodcock (Member # 3260) on March 12, 2015, 07:32 AM:

Only wish I would still be around to see that happen Simon. [Big Grin]

Posted by Robert Tucker (Member # 386) on March 12, 2015, 04:37 PM:

Hopefully your GS will still be working in a 100 years [Eek!]

Posted by Andrew Woodcock (Member # 3260) on March 12, 2015, 06:44 PM:

Well Simon already has a Fumeo, just in case Robert! [Wink]

Posted by David Guest (Member # 2791) on March 13, 2015, 04:03 AM:

I have 3 stunning prints of bond films all on 16mm
goldfinger
dr no
on her majestys secret service
might be showing goldfinger on Friday night at my film fair in November and this will be free entry to watch

Posted by Nigel Higgins (Member # 4312) on March 13, 2015, 01:06 PM:

i hope you can show it david ,i will try and get there on the friday for it.

Posted by Ron Douglas (Member # 2990) on March 14, 2015, 01:41 PM:

That sounds wonderful David, look forward to seeing that.
Incidentally, I was thinking of screening a few prints and charging a small fee which would go to charity. Do you have to pay royalties for your screenings at Blackpool? I would assume public screenings attract a charge of some sort. If you happen to know, your help would be much appreciated.

Posted by Andrew Woodcock (Member # 3260) on March 14, 2015, 06:13 PM:

Hope you pull it off Ron!

Posted by Ron Douglas (Member # 2990) on March 15, 2015, 10:18 AM:

Thanks Andrew, I suspect that small public screenings open a bigger can of worms than most of us care to deal with, but I'm curious to pursue permission from the respective copyright holders, or at least ask if they will consider my application...perhaps tickets at £80 each to cover copyright fees might be tricky to sell, no matter what the cause!

Posted by Robert Tucker (Member # 386) on March 16, 2015, 05:49 PM:

Hi Ron,

Being directly involved in organizing public screenings before with The Picture House company at there headquarters in Soho in London. Where we struck a deal for once a month shows. Normally copyright is generally not a problem depending on film distributor/company. It's just a question of tracking down and finding out who actually owns the actual rights today. Normally a independent cinema franchise can help you with this. The main problem you will find is actually getting a sponsor so that you can at least break even or make a small profit from your takings.

Posted by David Guest (Member # 2791) on March 16, 2015, 06:31 PM:

I was under the impression that if film show was free and was by invitation only private show there is no royalties to be paid

Posted by Ron Douglas (Member # 2990) on March 17, 2015, 12:18 AM:

Thanks Robert.
I've been in touch with Eon in the UK. I understand the copyright is held by Danjaq LLC in the US, along with MGM.
I'll definitely let you know how it goes.
David, interesting point you raise about the film show being private and you not charging. We are charging, though all monies are going to the local hospital trust for a particular cause.

Posted by David C. Lucidi (Member # 4020) on March 17, 2015, 08:08 AM:

Robert, since you are from the UK, I am curious....does your Goldfinger have the correct "003" ending on the bomb countdown (in the Ft. Knox scene), or the US changed "007" version?

I too have an IB Tech print, printed December 1964 (according to the leaders), and it is the correct "003" ending.

UBB.classic^TM 6.3.1.2