Posts: 1633
From: Cheshire, U.K.
Registered: Dec 2003
posted August 02, 2006 10:58 AM
Jan, if you're interested, I see Derann have just listed a mint copy of "Goldfinger" on their latest used film list. £299.00.
posted August 02, 2006 11:07 PM
Interested?? Rob, my heart skipped two beats when I saw GOLDFINGER on the list. And thanks for letting me know, you're the third person to do so - unfortunately this time around it's simply too expensive And did you know the movie was on the previous sales list as well? Apparently I'm not the only one who thinks it's a tad bit overpriced - although I certainly see the value of a "mint Kodak pre-stripe print." Which only makes it all the more painful to have to let it go, arrgh!
But my day will come... I know my day will come.
-------------------- Call me Phoenix. *dusts off the ashes*
posted August 03, 2006 09:49 AM
You're kind of right there - guess it's just I simply have to be careful with money these days! However I didn't necessarily mean to say the price was unreasonable.
Another thing is that the exchange rate from GBP to USD really sucks right now. Earlier this year it seemed much better.
Even now I'm struggling with myself, and credit cards are all too tempting...
-------------------- Call me Phoenix. *dusts off the ashes*
Posts: 701
From: Massachusetts
Registered: Jun 2003
posted August 03, 2006 10:35 AM
Hmm...
I guess many years of film collecting has taught me that if something high on my want list comes up for sale -- grab it. You never know when another one will come around (if ever)...
I've made that mistake a couple of times (not buying something) and I've always regretted it...
As for being able to afford it -- that's a general problem with any hobby -- the good stuff is always going to be expensive, and you have to budget for it...
Posts: 250
From: Battle Creek, MI. USA
Registered: Apr 2004
posted August 04, 2006 11:25 PM
The picture quality on the Super Eight optical airline prints is far superior to the package movie versions. From what I understand Cubby Broccoli supervised the airline prints and they used the finest pre-print since they were authorized by Eon Productions. I was told they were to be destroyed after use by the airlines but Ray Courts was able to rescue a few for me.
Posts: 250
From: Battle Creek, MI. USA
Registered: Apr 2004
posted August 05, 2006 08:41 PM
Hi Michael:
I think I read on the Thunderball leader that the print was either struck in 1983 or 1985. But, I don't think the stock is LPP "low fade" yet the color is good. It might very well be unmarked LPP and I have assumed the prints are on regular eastman stock all along.
If I'm correct in thinking this, LPP & Agfa type film stock is shiny on both the base and emulsion sides of the film.
Next time you have an opportunity to check your Bond flicks that you received from Ray Courts, it may be revealing to find that you certainly have a prize in more ways than one. Mostly due to the release dates which you had mentioned: 1983-1985
Michael
-------------------- Isn't it great that we can all communicate about this great hobby that we love!
posted May 24, 2017 05:22 AM
hi! to all.all james bond movies with sir.roger moore they are all in scope,with sean connery only two were made in scope,
-thurderball ~-you only live twice
I just want to clarify,the other post of mine,about the aspect ratio of the james bond movies,i meat the theater released.
[ May 24, 2017, 09:59 AM: Message edited by: Douglas Meltzer ]
Posts: 955
From: Johnshaven Village , Montrose, Scotland
Registered: Jan 2015
posted May 24, 2017 09:49 AM
There is another Roger Moore Bond that was not in Scope. THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN. 1.66:1 . I know this because I showed them when first released.
-------------------- " My equipment's more important than your rats. "