8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 16mm Forum   » Why purchase a Very Faded Print?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Why purchase a Very Faded Print?
Alan Rik
Film God

Posts: 2211
From: New York City, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted May 26, 2015 07:45 AM      Profile for Alan Rik   Email Alan Rik   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hello. I just saw an Auction for "Dawn of the Dead" on Ebay. 16mm print that sold for $500 +. Why would someone pay that much for a print that is almost completely RED?
I don't think a faded Super 8 print would get that much. Are 16mm viewers watching faded prints? I hate faded prints. Just curious if our 16mm brethren here have a different viewpoint in regards to purchasing RED prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Barker
Master Film Handler

Posts: 395
From: Lancashire, England
Registered: Jun 2014


 - posted May 26, 2015 07:55 AM      Profile for Paul Barker   Email Paul Barker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i never entertained faded or red prints. yet i know many are willing to buy and view them. same thing with badly scratched prints. i have seen collectors at film fairs buy films in this condition.red, pink,or with numerous lines/scratches. rare title or not.to me its stuff for the bin. if its a film i love i want to view it as best as i can get it.which is usually digital these days.

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Fritz
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: Burnsville, MN, USA
Registered: Dec 2009


 - posted May 26, 2015 09:30 AM      Profile for Barry Fritz   Email Barry Fritz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That topic and that film were discussed on the 16mm forum. There are various opinions.

[ May 26, 2015, 11:39 AM: Message edited by: Barry Fritz ]

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Rik
Film God

Posts: 2211
From: New York City, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted May 26, 2015 10:16 AM      Profile for Alan Rik   Email Alan Rik   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for the link but I was hoping the 16mm members here could chime in. Last thing I need is another password! [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Groves
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 508
From: Southend on Sea, Essex, UK
Registered: Feb 2015


 - posted May 26, 2015 11:31 AM      Profile for Dave Groves     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only faded film I've ever bought was 'Thief of Bagdad' simply because I've always loved it, secondly because I've only seen one other copy for sale, thirdly because I could afford it and lastly because the grim reaper is nearer than I'm comfortable with and continued waiting isn't an option. I've never set out to buy faded prints. Didn't need to. I just waited for what I'd got to turn. Don't find a great pleasure in watching a poor print when I can get the same film on blu-ray for a few pounds. But very often one has no choice if owning a print of a particular title is really important. Trouble is red prints never improve.

--------------------
Dave

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Fritz
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: Burnsville, MN, USA
Registered: Dec 2009


 - posted May 26, 2015 11:45 AM      Profile for Barry Fritz   Email Barry Fritz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry Alan. I thought that link would get you to the thread without having to log in. Basically, most members said they would not show a faded print and therefore would not buy one. Others, only fewer, said they might buy it if it was a print they really, really wanted and were not likely to get otherwise. It was interesting that there were more that a few people that bid on that print and it sold for quite a bit. Most of the members thought the price was way to high, and the print was not worth that much. Others commented a print is worth what someone was willing to pay for it.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted May 26, 2015 01:00 PM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
I am always reluctant to buy faded prints, however so long as a film contains some good colour in it, if the sound track is good or can be made even better with digital transfer, then I will buy them on Super 8mm.

One such print that springs to mind is a recent acquisition of the Elvis Viacom print "Girls Girls Girls".

It came to me at a reasonable price for a full feature c/w original box and reels etc and was not as badly faded as another print of this I had already.
The Sound quality was poor on a few of the reels but I have taken a few afternoons out of my days off to re record this one from the DVD.

Now the enjoyment I gain from watching this film is almost as high as any lpp print with standard Derann quality sound.

Return to Sender is fabulous watched and listened to whilst being beamed onto the big screen, and while Elvis films will never be remembered for their brilliant scripts, they hold a charm and historical nostalgia all of their own.
These type of prints are well worth preserving for as long as is possible in my opinion.

While slightly faded prints are never the ones that people desire the most, they can, in many cases, offer great value for money so long as they have been kept in optimum scratch free condition and have other redeeming features like for example, a fantastic stereo sound track.

Personally, so long as the print has no major emulsion scratches and SOME colour, if it is a title you enjoy, there are many bargains still to be had out there.

Totally red prints though should probably never be passed onto another unless the purchaser is fully aware of just HOW faded this particular print is. I have been "had" on many an occasion by "subjectively optimistic" descriptions before now.

In such cases, always demand a screenshot or two before deciding for yourself.

[ May 26, 2015, 06:45 PM: Message edited by: Andrew Woodcock ]

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged

Janice Glesser
Film Goddess

Posts: 3468
From: Sunnyvale, CA USA
Registered: Sep 2011


 - posted May 26, 2015 03:32 PM      Profile for Janice Glesser     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I find filters to be a great help in transforming a redish fading print into an image more watchable. I have about 5 16mm prints that are in various stages of turning red or losing it's color. Most of these prints I bought not knowing exactly how much the color had degraded. I kept them because the sellers were nice enough to make adjustments in the price and I really liked the movies...and with the filters I can still enjoy viewing them.

--------------------
Janice

"I'm having a very good day!"
Richard Dreyfuss - Let It Ride (1989).

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted May 26, 2015 04:08 PM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
Janice does of course, make a very valid point, however those very red prints are, in my experience irretrievable, no matter what the filter. So a print has to have at least some colour in it for this to be worthwhile as a solution.

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Arpin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 953
From: Sunland, CA, USA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted May 26, 2015 10:42 PM      Profile for Larry Arpin   Author's Homepage   Email Larry Arpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I went to a garage sale for the specific purpose of picking up The Amazing Howard Hughes knowing it must be faded. I paid $40 for the full 2-parter. There is a cut down version on DVD. The first part was faded but the 2nd part was on LPP stock. I have some faded Tom & Jerrys on super 8mm & 16mm.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Silvester
Master Film Handler

Posts: 282
From: England
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted May 27, 2015 08:10 AM      Profile for Mark Silvester     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi all

I had my fair share of red/going red prints in 16mm...I don't like them...they are not value for money - in fact they are rubbish..despite your filter - which I have tried to use.
I would suggest that for whatever reason it created what I used to call a selling frenzy...it happens. I got some outrageous prices for some mediocre titles back in the day.. (not red prints)..Only a lunatic would pay $500 for a print that was red - unless conned or involved in a schill bid to crank the price up..

--------------------
Mark Silvester

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Crewdson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1031
From: UK
Registered: Jun 2013


 - posted May 27, 2015 08:11 AM      Profile for Robert Crewdson     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On forums I am always reading about people binning either films or projectors. I don't like faded or red prints myself, but what might seem trash to one might be treasure to another. I have also read posts where someone would rather dump a Bell & Howell projector than get the worm replaced because it's cheaper to buy another on Ebay; and what happens when that goes; take it to the local tip, and buy another. I thought most here would be interested in the long term preservation of our films and equipment. What I see is digital being mentioned more and more.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Silvester
Master Film Handler

Posts: 282
From: England
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted May 27, 2015 08:28 AM      Profile for Mark Silvester     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Robert

good to see you back on forums..again..I think that the one thing that unites all is not obsessive "buy" all...but a considered interest in their own perspective of the film/movie/showman elements of the hobby..I do like video p/j...but I also like my 8mm projector...But most of all I like big screen entertainment. And I think this forum encompasses it all now...just my six pennorth worth.. [Eek!]

--------------------
Mark Silvester

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted May 27, 2015 01:03 PM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
What will always make me tick with film is just how tactile a hobby it actually is.

I have to work hard on my films before I am truly satisfied with them for presentation purposes. Cleaning,splicing, recording,re spooling, artwork etc etc. It all takes huge amounts of time and my energies....but I absolutely love it when at the end I have a full feature to be proud of preferably on one reel with trailers and daysets etc. Just like the cinema experience I remember.

Incidentally I wholeheartedly agree with every sentiment from Roberts post above even though occasionally I have to admit to joining in with the digital equipment debates.

Please don't bin a projector, there is always someone who would want it for spares

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged

John Hermes
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 139
From: La Mesa, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 2008


 - posted May 27, 2015 11:34 PM      Profile for John Hermes     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Return to Sender is fabulous watched and listened to whilst being beamed onto the big screen, and while Elvis films will never be remembered for their brilliant scripts, they hold a charm and historical nostalgia all of their own.

RETURN TO SENDER - my favorite Elvis song. I had 35mm IB Tech print once of GGG. The color was unbelievable.

--------------------
John Hermes

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Woodcock
Film God

Posts: 7477
From: Manchester Uk
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted May 28, 2015 01:28 AM      Profile for Andrew Woodcock         Edit/Delete Post 
Very nice indeed John!! [Smile]

--------------------
"C'mon Baggy..Get with the beat"

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2