Posts: 606
From: Galveston, Texas, U.S.A.
Registered: Mar 2007
posted December 20, 2014 09:12 AM
That is really rather sick. I know that it was not uncommon in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to take photos of the dead before they wore buried but not in the 50s or 60s. I just can't imagine someone doing this.
Posts: 7016
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
posted December 20, 2014 06:22 PM
The reason people took funeral pictures back a hundred years ago was with the cost of photography it was likely to be the only picture a family ever got of a loved one.
-not the way I would choose to be remembered.
Bringing a movie camera is just taking it to another level.
-------------------- All I ask is a wide screen and a projector to light her by...