Posts: 82
From: Bath, England
Registered: Oct 2005
posted November 25, 2005 01:49 AM
Yes, I have a 1975 Niles catalog and it's in there on Reg, Super and 16mm. The other day there was a Blackhawk print on eBay too.
posted November 25, 2005 07:29 AM
Jan, If you can try and obtain the Blackhawk print, it is one of the best.
If you really want a good copy I have the full master negative in my collection if you want to try your hand at contact printing, should keep you busy in your laboratory for a while.
Craig
-------------------- I dream of becoming a dealer!!!!!! Is Perry's Movies for Sale.
posted November 25, 2005 06:34 PM
That is correct. However it retains a very slight vinegar smell (but is holding up fine right now). So if I can get another copy of the film for cheap, I'll consider doing that... also I'd LOVE to find the German Atlas print as I believe it has that wonderful, beautiful orchestral soundtrack I've been looking for ever since I had the Piccolo-Film 100ft. extract of the feature (which I believe has the same music).
-------------------- Call me Phoenix. *dusts off the ashes*
posted November 29, 2005 11:28 PM
Oh, believe me, I'm well aware of that... I did have two Niles prints of Hoppity Goes To Town once... one was fuzzy and way too soft, but strangely the other one (which I'm keeping) is razor-sharp and crisp. Go figure!?
-------------------- Call me Phoenix. *dusts off the ashes*
Posts: 346
From: Milano, Italy
Registered: Jan 2004
posted November 30, 2005 04:48 PM
Jan, I have a Blackhawk copy too but in mine there are almost 2 minutes in reel two with a sort of negative jumping of the scene. Is it present in your copy too? Does anybody know if this defect was common to many prints?
posted November 30, 2005 10:29 PM
Hmm.... now that you mention it... yes, I remember seeing the same jumping in my print of GOLD RUSH, too. I think it was later into the film (not reel 2), and it was very peculiar in that the image did exactly one little jump every second...and that lasted maybe a few minutes. Nothing terrible, but a minor annoyance nonetheless... maybe it was negative damage?
-------------------- Call me Phoenix. *dusts off the ashes*
Posts: 346
From: Milano, Italy
Registered: Jan 2004
posted December 01, 2005 05:23 PM
Yes, you're right, it is later in the film. It may be a negative damage, but the strange thing is that you have the full frame even with the jumping and no separation between frames is seen on the screen
posted December 01, 2005 10:51 PM
You're right! Maybe it has something to do with the frame aperture of the original 35mm film vs. its super-8 counterpart... could be that the original aspect ratio was closer to a square format than the standard 4:3 format, thus there would have been extra image information on the top/bottom that was cropped to fit the image into the super-8 format. That might explain why there are no frame lines... Very mysterious, though.
-------------------- Call me Phoenix. *dusts off the ashes*