8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » Old prints (e.g. Ken Films, Marketing, U-8, UFA, etc) that have held color (Page 1)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!  
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Old prints (e.g. Ken Films, Marketing, U-8, UFA, etc) that have held color
Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted August 26, 2010 02:14 PM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
[edit]: I have changed a bit the title, so now we are not only talking Ken or U8, but all prints released during the 8mm heyday (until 1980s) which are still holding the color well. Please note that not only LPP/AGFA will keep the color but also Eastman, depend on how it was processed. One of example is provided below (Elvis Hawaiian Paradise) and it is not Eastman LPP too, just Eastman.

ps: Derann/CHC new prints do not fall into this category because they were printed after 1990s

Following the other discussion:

quote:
Adrian Winchester:
...I have any Universal 8 left that isn't faded. I checked a few and although a previously OK 'Creature Fom the Black Lagoon' had 'gone', my scope 'Jaws 2' has little or no fade and 'The Island' is holding up well too. So if anyone has non-faded U8 prints not in the fridge, enjoy them while you can!


and

quote:


Douglas Meltzer:
How about a new thread about Kens & U-8s that have held their color? I have quite a few!


I'd like to start a new thread for these two specific companies which are well known to have faded by now.

But as Doug stated above, some prints are lucky.

Please bear in your mind that Ken last releases (1980s) were printed on LPP stock. So I believe some of them have held their color until now. If you have it, please report here.

However, as Adrian mentioned also above, some U8s belong to me were also used to be good. But when I screened it last time, they have faded to red-red wine.

I never found U8 have still held the color. Any one get luckier?

So let's start post your title here so we know when bidding the item on Ebay we can get lucky as you. Providing screen shots will be more helpful. Let start with me:

The Sand Pebbles
Length: 400"
Released by: Ken Films
Country: USA
Stock: Kodak SP
Lab: Maritz
Date of Print: ....

 -

 -

 -

cheers,

[ October 28, 2010, 08:45 AM: Message edited by: Winbert Hutahaean ]

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Kimball
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1171
From: Highland Mills, NY USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted August 26, 2010 10:25 PM      Profile for Brad Kimball   Email Brad Kimball   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My Frank Langella "Dracula" 2-parter and 1-400' versions have held up well. Also, my "Airport '79" still has good color. My 2-parter of "High Plains Drifter" has shifted into the brown/red spectrum which is somewhat tolerable being that it's a western and brown is normally the predominant color for the genre (all the brown plains, tumbleweeds and western town facades).

[ September 01, 2010, 08:03 PM: Message edited by: Brad Kimball ]

 |  IP: Logged

Douglas Meltzer
Moderator

Posts: 4554
From: New York, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted September 01, 2010 05:40 PM      Profile for Douglas Meltzer   Email Douglas Meltzer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Let's start with some Ken titles. I pulled out some I remembered being okay, but hadn't seen in a while.

The Towering Inferno Part One:
Lab info to come.

 -

 -

 -

Not bad for Eastman!
These are from The Pit and the Pendulum. the color is muted, but not faded:
Lab: Technicolor

 -

 -

 -

Conquest of the Planet of the Apes:
Lab: Movielab

 -

 -

It's nice to see that not every film has turned red.

Doug

--------------------
I think there's room for just one more film.....

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Kimball
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1171
From: Highland Mills, NY USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted September 01, 2010 08:08 PM      Profile for Brad Kimball   Email Brad Kimball   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have the first "Apes" and "Beneath" from KEN and both look surprisingly good considering they're both about 25 years old. I'll try to get some pics up - still trying to figure the whole uploading thing out. It works good on Ebay, but I always seem to have trouble here. It's not the site - I'm sure it's something I'm doing or not doing. It's so charming how we all have these titles on digital format yet we still choose to watch these old digests from nearly a quarter of a century back.

 |  IP: Logged

Douglas Meltzer
Moderator

Posts: 4554
From: New York, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted September 01, 2010 09:21 PM      Profile for Douglas Meltzer   Email Douglas Meltzer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,

I have an outdated email address for you. Please use my email link and I'll send you my version of the uploading instructions.

Doug

--------------------
I think there's room for just one more film.....

 |  IP: Logged

Adrian Winchester
Film God

Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted September 02, 2010 08:56 AM      Profile for Adrian Winchester     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know it's a big task, but it would be good to work towards compiling a definitive list of what from each distributor appeared on low fade stocks, or even SP as some are holding up well and could be early attempts at LPP. This would enable collectors to know what titles are worth looking out for with regard to good colour. Maybe some of us could volunteer to do this in relation to compiling information on a specific distributor.

It's interesting to know about Universal 8 or other prints that still look good, but of course it doesn't mean that other unfaded copies of these titles are readily available, or that they won't fade soon. I'm sure that (e.g.) my 'Pit and the Pendulum' is now typical warm Eastman. I'd be surprised if there are ANY Universal 8 release where ALL the members here who have it would find that their copies are not faded.

As for Ken, probably the best print I have for non-faded colour is 'The Rose' on Agfa. I'm not sure if I've ever owned a Ken release on LPP.

[ September 02, 2010, 02:59 PM: Message edited by: Adrian Winchester ]

--------------------
Adrian Winchester

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Arpin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 953
From: Sunland, CA, USA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted September 02, 2010 02:36 PM      Profile for Larry Arpin   Author's Homepage   Email Larry Arpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've had a print of SILVER STREAK on low fade, don't know if it was LPP or Agfa. It was printed a little to the yellow side though. I have some Tom & Jerrys from the Ken/MGM that are on low fade. I will try and check to see what stock they are on.

 |  IP: Logged

John Skujins
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 220
From: Greensboro, NC, USA
Registered: Mar 2009


 - posted September 02, 2010 02:59 PM      Profile for John Skujins   Email John Skujins   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My Empire Strikes Back Volume 2 still has great color (Volume 1 not so much).

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Kimball
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1171
From: Highland Mills, NY USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted September 02, 2010 08:30 PM      Profile for Brad Kimball   Email Brad Kimball   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have MGM/KEN verison of Tom & Jerry in "Cruise Cat" and the color is warm, but still palatable. Some spots are actually quite nice.

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Arpin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 953
From: Sunland, CA, USA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted September 02, 2010 10:11 PM      Profile for Larry Arpin   Author's Homepage   Email Larry Arpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I looked at both films and they both had '3 S'. The titles are DESIGNS ON JERRY & LITTLE ORPHAN.

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted September 02, 2010 10:31 PM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi all,

Since I started this thread focusing only on Ken and U8 can we limit on that two companies only please. If we go to MGM for Tom & Jerry, it has been covered here:

MGM also printed on AGFA

which was started by me too. So based on that thread, it has been proven that MGM did sometime print on AGFA stock.

But for Ken and U8 were still a mystery for me if they printed on low fade stock too.

However, from the above responses it seems that at the end of its production, Ken switched to AGFA for a couple of reasons. For example the 2 Empire Strikes Back, The Rose, and Silver Streak.

To be honest, I want to see what kind of low fade quality they have (is it the same like Derann's?). So can you guys post your picture here.

At the moment, I 'd like to post non-pinkish Ken Films:

Can-Can
Length: 400"
Released by: Ken Films
Country: USA
Stock: Eastman
Lab: Cine Magnetic Inc.
Date of Print: ....

 -

 -

 -

The three pictures above has been posted on the other thread. It can be not-faded print or on the opposite it is lab fault. I don't know!

I also want to see some more U8 with low fade or slightly fade. Douglas, didn't you tell me that you have Battlestar Galactica and the sequel without any sign of fade. Can you post pictures here please?

cheers

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Douglas Meltzer
Moderator

Posts: 4554
From: New York, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted September 03, 2010 10:04 AM      Profile for Douglas Meltzer   Email Douglas Meltzer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Winbert,

I went to check on Battlestar and it is now officially faded. I had not screened it for at least 4 years. I'll have to look at Mission Galactica and see what surprises that holds.

Doug

--------------------
I think there's room for just one more film.....

 |  IP: Logged

John Skujins
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 220
From: Greensboro, NC, USA
Registered: Mar 2009


 - posted September 03, 2010 09:13 PM      Profile for John Skujins   Email John Skujins   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I took these pics tonight of my ESB Part 2.
The head and tail leaders have a date of Dec 23, 1982, but I don't know the film type.

 -

 -

 -

 -

 -

 -

 -

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Kimball
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1171
From: Highland Mills, NY USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted September 04, 2010 09:30 PM      Profile for Brad Kimball   Email Brad Kimball   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My prints of SW (Parts 1 & 2) are pretty faded with a very red/yellow hue throughout. My ESB (Parts 1 & 2) are actually pretty decent. Not quite as nice as the shots from John's print above, but not as bad as the first SW digests I have. My daughter and the neighbor's son like to watch them on the big white wall in our living room (this is where we show the film on film nights). They're both 7 years old and they get a hoot from seeing the SW digests larger than the 30" our tv provides. My daughter is so bugging me to get an EPSON MOVIEMATE, but they're so damned expensive. I just can't wrap my arms around the $1,000 price tag - not to mention the Mrs. would think I'd lost my marbles.

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted September 05, 2010 07:05 AM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good pictures John, and thanks for posting them here.

It is definitely one of low fade (maybe LPP or AGFA) released by Ken at he end of their production.

It reminds me on my "the Rose" which has similar quality. I will post some pictures when I return from holiday.

cheers,

winbert

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Adrian Winchester
Film God

Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted September 06, 2010 09:32 AM      Profile for Adrian Winchester     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John - It looks pretty conclusive that it's a low fade print. Markings can be feint and difficult to spot, but you might see them if you check 2 or 3 feet, looking between the sprocket holes. A magnifying glass is essential.

Regarding Universal prints, I think we have to view them differently to Ken, because although a few have held their colour, as I understand it no one has EVER identified one as being printed on low fade stock.

--------------------
Adrian Winchester

 |  IP: Logged

John Skujins
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 220
From: Greensboro, NC, USA
Registered: Mar 2009


 - posted September 06, 2010 10:49 AM      Profile for John Skujins   Email John Skujins   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I looked closely between sprocket holes on the leader and every few feet there were letters which were partially covered by the balancing stripe, so they were hard to make out. I saw what looked like ACCC, LAOI, ANL, LA, AN, LII, OX.

I would like to know if any of the Star Wars Part 2 prints were low-fade. Anybody know?

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted September 06, 2010 08:03 PM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Regarding Universal prints, I think we have to view them differently to Ken, because although a few have held their colour, as I understand it no one has EVER identified one as being printed on low fade stock.

Adrian, that was my understanding too, until the latest Derann list said that "Thoroughly Modern Millie" graded as no fade at all. I knew that this title was released on 2 version, i.e yellow strip on the top with photo picture below that and new U8 boxing with white box covered by an insert/envelop, similar with those 2 x 400" from U8(and for "Modern Millie" was pinky colour).

I don't know if the no-fade that Derann says is the first one or the second one. But I have the first one with fading color. Can you can ask Derann?

But when you were referring "no one has EVER identified one as being printed on low fade stock" was for all their releases, I can tell you that some of their carton (200") were printed on AGFA. I knew Woody woodpeckers, Andy Panda and sort of are one of them.

Osi once confirmed it here too.

So, can someone post the pictures of your U8 please.

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

Adrian Winchester
Film God

Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted September 07, 2010 05:11 PM      Profile for Adrian Winchester     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Winbert, I think the white plastic Universal boxes with the outer sleeves were the last type they used as I'm sure the final 400' releases only appeared in these. I don't think there's any direct correlation between boxes and stock used but I expect any non-faded prints are more likely to be later batches.

Interestiong to hear about the U8 Agfa cartoons; I had a vague recollection of hearing of low fade U8 cartoons but I was mistakenly thinking that these were 16mm versions. Maybe these were printed later than any 400' releases. If anyone identified a U8 low fade 400' release, that would still be a surprise.

I'm short of time now but I'll see if I can do some screen shots next week.

--------------------
Adrian Winchester

 |  IP: Logged

James N. Savage 3
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1375
From: Washington, DC
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted October 14, 2010 05:37 AM      Profile for James N. Savage 3     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi!

Came across one of my old KEN Films with good color last night. I'm sure there are more. I'll post when I come across them

Here's "MAKO-JAWS OF DEATH":

 -
 -
 -

Fun digest too!

James.

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted October 14, 2010 10:15 AM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
James, thanks for posting it. But will all due respect, that prints look have faded to me. I believe it is on Eastman stock.

It is supposed to be graded as "has faded with some colors left"

Below are pictures that I also provided in the other thread. Originally it was taken in 2005.

It is Elvis "Paradise Hawaiian Style" released in a clam shell type box. It doesn't clearly say "Ken film" but we know that all Elvis digests were printed by Ken (with one exception "Change of Habit" from Universal 8 ).

Printed on Eastman stock, but I don;t know if I screen today it may have faded too. Hope not ...

 -

 -

 -


cheers

[ July 10, 2012, 10:22 AM: Message edited by: Winbert Hutahaean ]

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged

James N. Savage 3
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1375
From: Washington, DC
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted October 16, 2010 05:03 AM      Profile for James N. Savage 3     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now that you mention it Winbert, it does look a little faded in the screen shots. Thats funny, because when I was watching it, it looked great on the big screen! [Wink] I guess I was comparing it to my "JAWS" 2 x 400 digest, where even the water looks red before the shark attacks! MAKO looks so much better than that one.

But that Elvis print looks p-e-r-f-e-c-t!

I'll check for more when I get a chance.

James.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Kimball
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1171
From: Highland Mills, NY USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted October 17, 2010 09:01 AM      Profile for Brad Kimball   Email Brad Kimball   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jim, I can't believe how nice the colors are in your "Mako". Just about all the KEN/MGM and other color titles I have are crap - pure tomato juice.

 |  IP: Logged

David Kilderry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 963
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted October 18, 2010 03:07 AM      Profile for David Kilderry   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When this thread began I thought it would be short list; other than the stunning Elvis print it looks like I'm correct.

John, that Empire Stikes Back is as good a copy that I have seen in recent years, but even then I consider it has slight fade. When I first ran my Star Wars, when brand new, the colour was perfect, it only took about 10 years and I could see the fade starting, now at over 30 you'd consider it faded.

 |  IP: Logged

Winbert Hutahaean
Film God

Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted October 18, 2010 09:02 AM      Profile for Winbert Hutahaean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David, film will fade eventually.

I have a Marketing Films "Raiders of the Lost ark" where we all know here it is on AGFA. Some members say that their Raider is still in excellent color, no fade at all.

But mine (although also on AGFA) has faded like this:

 -

 -

The fade of my film is much clearer on the below 3 pictures because the scene was outside and brighter.

 -

 -

 -

and when it came to a darker scene, fade was more horrifying !!

 -

It was discussed in the older thread here:

http://8mmforum.film-tech.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=003953# 000000

No matter our films are on LPP, AGFA, or Kodak SP, it will fade eventually.

That is the reality we have with film collecting.

I understand you just purchased a Marketing Film from Andreas E which you say has a perfect color, can you provide some screen shots please.

--------------------
Winbert

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2