8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » General Yak   » Pixar's Wall-E and Presto

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Pixar's Wall-E and Presto
Jean-Marc Toussaint
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: France
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted June 24, 2008 02:24 AM      Profile for Jean-Marc Toussaint   Author's Homepage   Email Jean-Marc Toussaint   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I attended a premiere of "Wall-E" yesterday night. The guys at Pixar have done it again. It's an incredible film, quite ballsy (no dialogue for at least a good third of the movie, alarming messages...) and fantastic characters.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: these talented people have gone beyond making cartoons from day one. They do know how to make films.

And "Presto", the short opener is once again absolutely hilarious. On par, if not better, than "Lifted".
(And, yes, it would make a good super 8 short, providing a lab agrees to convert a pillarboxed image to full frame).

--------------------
The Grindcave Cinema Website

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted June 24, 2008 07:02 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ya know Jean, (as well as everybody else) ...

CGI animated films have a small charm and in some cases it works well, (as in the case of Toy Story 1 & 2) ...

But I have really become rather dis-enchanted with them. Granted, I'm 42 and not a kid in this modern computer age, but I'm really bored with CGI and don't even check them out on DVD as a general rule. So I'm happy that they haven't done a lot of Super 8 CGI feature releases.

I do absolutely love hand drawn animation.

Perhaps because it's actually done by a living person ... by hand, and not from some program on a computer. It's been so sad to see hand drawn animation have such a quick death (for the most part, and when I see one advertised, I'm more inclined to go see it, as I'm seeing the ending of an era dying a slow but beautiful death.

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Arpin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 953
From: Sunland, CA, USA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted June 24, 2008 11:52 PM      Profile for Larry Arpin   Author's Homepage   Email Larry Arpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just to let you know someone at our work, a former animator, doing dustbusting went back to Disney to work on Princess and the Frog. He said he will first work on the trailer. So you will soon see another drawn animated movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Jean-Marc Toussaint
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: France
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted June 26, 2008 03:39 AM      Profile for Jean-Marc Toussaint   Author's Homepage   Email Jean-Marc Toussaint   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Osi, I am older than you are, I have worked in animation in the early 90s (art director for the french studio of the Ninja Turtles, among other things) and comic books (Marvel and Topps) and always considered the computer to be a fantastic tool. No more, no less. It's not because you have Photoshop installed on your machine that you a/ know how to use it b/ know how to draw. Computers can't make films by themselves. If you don't have talented people using them (and most off them knowing how to draw and how to make films) what you just get is a stream of soulless images. And this what makes the difference between the great (Pixar) and the others.
And if Disney is reverting to classical hand drawn animation (I was too devastated by the news of the mouse house decision of doing only CG), it's thanks to John Lasseter.

--------------------
The Grindcave Cinema Website

 |  IP: Logged

Graham Ritchie
Film God

Posts: 4001
From: New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted June 26, 2008 06:41 PM      Profile for Graham Ritchie   Email Graham Ritchie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wall-E has not yet been released here yet but if the trailer is anything to go by its going to be a big hit. The Scope trailer is fantastic, I like the touch of them using some of the music from "The Great Escape" 1963 with Steve McQueen anyone old enough to remember it [Wink] I have the "Madagascar" trl on 35mm picture and sound is great on my 80yr old Ernemann 2 might add Wall-E after the film has finished its run, ideal trl for a Super8 Scope release.

PS. Has anyone got a copy of "Knick Knack" on 8mm or 35mm [Cool] they might want to part with?.

Graham. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted June 27, 2008 12:05 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have to admit that Wall-E has an interesting trailer. I'm just not enamored with CGI as a general rule.

at least I'm not as anal as those people who gripe about CGI used in such films as the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy.

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Brandenstein
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1632
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007


 - posted June 27, 2008 04:32 PM      Profile for Bill Brandenstein   Email Bill Brandenstein   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow, Wall-E is looking to be the best reviewed film of the year, so far. It will be interesting to see how much the word-of-mouth helps it now that opening weekend is here.

[ July 03, 2008, 12:20 PM: Message edited by: Bill Brandenstein ]

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Rik
Film God

Posts: 2211
From: New York City, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 02, 2008 09:02 AM      Profile for Alan Rik   Email Alan Rik   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just saw Wall-E and I agree. Great film!
In regards to the CGI vs. Hand drawn, CGI has come so far now that the novelty has worn off and the only thing that will really make you take notice of a film..is its story. And Wall-E is storytelling at its best. A film like this would have cost 10 times as much if it was done live and probably take 10 times longer. CGI is now a viable alternative for telling a story in film. Love the Mac startup chime! (**spoiler**)

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Klare
Film Guy

Posts: 7016
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 02, 2008 10:43 AM      Profile for Steve Klare   Email Steve Klare   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I like hand drawn, I like CGI. I don't mind seeing them blended. They are different artistic tools for animators to choose when telling a story.

-what I do mind is when Accountants do the choosing and even kill off choices permanently.

Of course even artistic companies need to make sure that nobody's robbing the cash register, but creative choices should never be made on economic grounds alone!

I am itching to see Wall-E, and will probably get there next week. Even the poorest Pixar is still a great movie!

--------------------
All I ask is a wide screen and a projector to light her by...

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Brandenstein
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1632
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007


 - posted July 03, 2008 12:23 PM      Profile for Bill Brandenstein   Email Bill Brandenstein   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dittos aplenty.

Why is it that accountants and executives are taking so long to see what is obvious to us? If "Princess and the Frog" has a great story, my kids (and I!) will gladly get in line to see it. I'm glad Disney has some faith in the traditional way. And I guarantee you that my kids don't care.

Have you seen the state of Saturday morning/Cartoon network animation lately?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Klare
Film Guy

Posts: 7016
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 03, 2008 09:22 PM      Profile for Steve Klare   Email Steve Klare   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As the Dad of a very Media Savvy five year old I certainly do!

This stuff is just awful! Very one dimensional and annoyingly educational/preachy at times. I usually try to help him out by threading up a few Bugs Bunnies after dark. As long as my kid takes Yosemite Sam as a bad example, he'll do just fine!

Let's be honest, I like accountants just fine. I dated one before I met my wife, and I'll have to say her assets perfectly balanced her liabilities, so to speak. A dearly departed friend was an accountant and a good one, and I miss him plenty. (I miss HER too, here and there...)

The problem with our friends with the adding machines is sometimes they are so focused on the bottom line they fail to see the really big picture.

I came very close to losing my job once because even though it was established that I was actually a very valuable guy (-based on other people's opinions: I just try to show up every day...), there was no room for me in the budget. It was only resolved when the President of the company told the Director of Accounting it was HER job to "make room".

Once again, we appreciate our Accounting Brethren (or "Sistren", where applicable), just as we will certainly enjoy WALL-E!

-Somebody has to keep an eye on the strongbox!

--------------------
All I ask is a wide screen and a projector to light her by...

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Klare
Film Guy

Posts: 7016
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 10, 2008 09:54 AM      Profile for Steve Klare   Email Steve Klare   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We finally got to see Wall-E last night. It is a definite step forward for Pixar.

The animation has reached the point where for most of the movie it simply looked like live-action footage. The only place where this failed was whenever human beings showed up. This is Pixar's one weakness: people. In my opinion they have an edge on everybody else in pretty much every respect, but for example Dreamworks' human characters are much more photorealistic. The human characters in Wall-E are much like the ones in The Incredibles: they look like they are made of vinyl. They have come a long way from the more doll-like people in "Toy Story", though.

Pixar's strongest suit has always been story telling. This one is no different. There's a depth of feeling to a lot of the characters, and it's shocking the range of emotion they pull out of a robot whose "face" is basically a pair of "eyes" on a "neck"; all the more so when he loses them after a forced reboot and you sense he really is just a machine. It is as much an action movie as a comedy, as a drama. Some people have griped a little about the "environmental message" in it. If there is a "message" at all, it's simply that if you make a mess and don't deal with it, it will eventually come back to haunt you. Any adult should know this. If they taught my kid this message, then the price of the ticket will become a great investment!

The action is a little intense at times, so much that my almost first grader got a little scared here and there. Overall he still enjoyed it. Bring a 3 year old to see this and you may be sorry.

A little unusually for Pixar, there is a sprinkling of pop-culture references, but they are very subtle on a Shrek scale of things.

"Presto" was absolutely great. As a sign of how much the Pixar people are cartoon fans it was even titled in a vintage Disney style. I would not fight the idea of having this one spooled up in my Elmo in the near future. (“Mr. Derann”, are you listening??)

--------------------
All I ask is a wide screen and a projector to light her by...

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Brandenstein
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1632
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007


 - posted July 10, 2008 05:17 PM      Profile for Bill Brandenstein   Email Bill Brandenstein   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Steve, if I'd known, I'd have invited you to join us!

Really, it's a pretty simple parable wrapped in a very abstract, sophisticated sci-fi movie. I like the emphasis given to the importance of relationships over electronics. But I'm still not sure what my kids got out of it given the "abstraction layer." Is the target audience the parents rather than the kids?

It's disappointing to me, on a technical note, how many so-called first-rate theaters have such a steep rake to the auditorium, that when showing a scope film such as this only a third of the screen can be in razor-sharp focus. Of course, this is because they're targeting only the bottom portion of the screen, which in some cases begins at a lower height than the lens...

It's also getting harder to figure out who's going to give you a good chest-thumping, wide-around-surround sound experience. THX and digital sound are rarely advertised any more, and some of the best results (for me) have turned up in some of the unadvertised spots. On the other hand, last night we were in a THX room but it sounded like the subwoofers were nearly off.

Well, I agree with Steve's comments and think that Wall-E and Presto deserve unqualified recommendation!

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Rik
Film God

Posts: 2211
From: New York City, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 10, 2008 05:50 PM      Profile for Alan Rik   Email Alan Rik   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That film is not in scope is it? I think its the full 35mm Frame just masked to look like Scope. I saw "Matchpoint" at a theatre here in NYC and the film was out of focus on the right side of the screen. Everytime a character walked across from right to left he would be blurry..and then in focus. I complained...others complained...the theatre finally got it right 15 minutes into the feature! Grrrr!!!!

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Klare
Film Guy

Posts: 7016
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 10, 2008 10:42 PM      Profile for Steve Klare   Email Steve Klare   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
IMDB 'sez 2.39:1, for whatever that's worth...

The film-collector's curse was going full force last night. at one point my eyes wandered over to the right edge of screen and there they were: two or three parallel lines! Usually when this happens my eyes stick to the defect like glue and I can't enjoy the movie. I kept repeating to myself "it's not my print, it's not my print..." and got my eyes back to screen center again for the rest of the movie.

What a crime! How old can this poor print be: a week and a half? This is a beautiful theater: clean, comfortable, modern yet furnished a lot nicer than our most local one. The floors are carpeted yet still not sticky! Still the same, they must take pretty poor care of their projection equipment. I have yet to see a film there without a line.

--------------------
All I ask is a wide screen and a projector to light her by...

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2