8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » whats considered a bad print

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: whats considered a bad print
Austin Holcomb
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 745
From: New Bloomington, OH, USA
Registered: Mar 2011


 - posted July 17, 2011 02:16 PM      Profile for Austin Holcomb     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
when you guys say a bad print what exactly do you mean?
thanks austin

 |  IP: Logged

Christian Bjorgen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 996
From: Kvinnherad, Norway
Registered: Oct 2009


 - posted July 17, 2011 03:21 PM      Profile for Christian Bjorgen   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For me it's if the print has one or more of several negative qualities.

- Alot of fade; beet-red/completely pink film.
- Sprocket damage that makes the print unenjoyable.
- Scratches, splices or lines that ruin the film.
- Lousy focus, over/under-exposure (b/w).
- Too much of the film missing.
- Ruined mag-stripe.

--------------------
Well who’s on first? Yeah. Go ahead and tell me. Who. The guy on first. Who. The guy playin’ first base. Who. The guy on first. Who is on first! What are you askin’ me for? I’m askin’ you!

 |  IP: Logged

David Kilderry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 963
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted July 17, 2011 08:29 PM      Profile for David Kilderry   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
...anything with Burt Reynolds in it.

 |  IP: Logged

Lee Mannering
Film God

Posts: 3216
From: The Projection Box
Registered: Nov 2006


 - posted July 18, 2011 06:44 AM      Profile for Lee Mannering     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Austin. Many collectors are extremely fussy if a print (film) has a slight scratch (line) on it which can be seen on screen when projecting for instance, or if the colour and image definition is not so good. Others will prefer a full length film as opposed to what is known as a cut down abridged version which were very often made available in the 1980’s. Speaking for myself it is now a reality that many prints have circulated a great deal changing hands many times and during this time may have not been projected on good or well maintained cine projectors, so it is inevitable to see some signs of wear to a film due to age, usage and issue type. The worse prints are often those where the colour has gone pink which happens on some film types, but on the whole it all depends if a film holds some special meaning for the collector who is willing to put up with ‘a bad print’ [Smile]
Happy collecting!

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Caruso
Film God

Posts: 4105
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 18, 2011 06:49 AM      Profile for Joe Caruso     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No box

 |  IP: Logged

Austin Holcomb
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 745
From: New Bloomington, OH, USA
Registered: Mar 2011


 - posted July 18, 2011 06:49 AM      Profile for Austin Holcomb     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
thanks [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted July 18, 2011 10:35 AM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey!

I will look at this from a pursuing a brand new manufactured print ...

A bad print is ...

1. One that has been taken from many dupes down from the original negative.

2. There are no grey tones (if B/W)

3. Poor condition of source material (scratches ect.)

Image is destroyed by bad lab work, (print washed out and terrible focus, which may well be beacause the lense was out of focus for the actual negative work or final lab work.

[ July 19, 2011, 01:03 PM: Message edited by: Osi Osgood ]

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Mallory
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 146
From: Montreal, QC
Registered: Jan 2011


 - posted July 18, 2011 12:33 PM      Profile for Scott Mallory   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David you didn't like "Sharkey's Machine?" For me I won't go anywhere near something that has VS, and I really got mad when I recently got a couple cartoons off Ebay that were not only missing their leader, but their beginning too. I can always throw on another leader, but missing sliced and diced chunks is a deal breaker for me.

--------------------
Scott

 |  IP: Logged

David Kilderry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 963
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted July 19, 2011 03:27 AM      Profile for David Kilderry   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was joking of course with my Burt comment......although I do recall walking out of Stroker Ace (Stand On It).

Fade is the biggest turn off for me and perhaps continuous green emulsion scratches. Too many splices as to make a projector loose its loop is also a turn off. Vinegar Syndrome is also a blow when you get that whiff on a print you have just bought.

Having said all this I do have prints in my collection that suffer from one or more of these maladies, sometimes its grab a poor one or nothing.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2