posted May 08, 2006 01:31 PM
Hello, please can anyone advise the cost of a mint condition, boxed, elmo f1.4 25-50 lens. I have been offered one, how much do these lenses sell for. This lens comes from a widow, i dont wish to short change her. Thanks for any advice
posted May 08, 2006 02:48 PM
Andy, I am lucky to have the Elmo 25-50mm lens, it is actually an f1.2 lens. This is a superb all glass lens and is quite heavy. It is the lens you must have for auditorium use. I believe John Clancy uses this lens at the BFCC. I paid $300.00 for mine on ebay.
-------------------- The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection, Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj
Posts: 2211
From: New York City, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
posted May 08, 2006 03:26 PM
Actually Elmo did come out with a 1.4 long throw lens before they had the 1.2. The 1.2 though is probably one of the best lenses every made for the Elmo line. It is in my opinion better than the 1.0 in terms of sharpness-
Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004
posted May 08, 2006 04:50 PM
Paul, Congratulations on tracking down the 1.2 version. I've heard that these are exceptionally rare, and your post represents the first evidence I've come across of someone actually owning one!
Posts: 2211
From: New York City, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
posted May 08, 2006 05:49 PM
I use to have one but I sold it along with my Xenon GS to the notorious Frank Adams! Then he sold the projector to Alan Gouger of this forum with the 1.2 and so now.. Alan Gouger has it. Also Phil's Vintage has one with a 1.0 to be sold as a set with 2x GS1200's here:
posted May 08, 2006 05:59 PM
I've got a pair of 1.4. One came with one of my GS and I bought the other from one of this forum members for 80GBP. I saw a 1.2 for 250 euros recently, so I guess Paul's price is right.
Posts: 4554
From: New York, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
posted May 08, 2006 10:36 PM
I have a 1.2 25-50mm and I'm in total agreement with Rik. It is the sharpest super 8mm lens I've seen. One problem: I'd need to make some holes in a few walls in order to get the projector far enough away from the screen to get a decent size picture!
Andy,
Sorry I can't quote you a price as the lens came with the projector.
Doug
-------------------- I think there's room for just one more film.....
posted May 09, 2006 04:24 PM
Hi, thanks for the replies, i will be bringing the lens along to Ealing as i have no requirement for it. So if anyone wants it for a few pence!!!, let me know.
posted May 10, 2006 02:52 AM
Andy, I've had Robert Tucker in touch with me recently after just that very lens. Assuming it is a 1.2 or 1.4 can you reserve it for him as he's coming to Ealing especially to look for one.
-------------------- British Film Collectors Convention home page www.bfcc.biz. The site is for the whole of the film collecting hobby and not just the BFCC.
posted November 03, 2009 06:57 AM
Ive got a 1.2 long throw lens but never used it. Can someone tell me the minimum and maximum distance you can use it for and still focus.
Just curious as lens sizes have always baffled me as to the size of the picture, distance etc.
Posts: 1269
From: Thetford , Norfolk,England
Registered: May 2008
posted November 03, 2009 08:56 AM
Depends on what gauge you are using it with. The picture width is inversely proportional to th focal length i.e. the picture will be half as wide at 50mm as it is at 25mm. Martin
-------------------- Retired TV Service Engineer Ongoing interest in Telecine....
Posts: 1269
From: Thetford , Norfolk,England
Registered: May 2008
posted November 03, 2009 12:16 PM
A 25 mm lens will give a picture 1.2 m wide at a throw of 6m with Super 8 film. Double the throw, you double the width. Double the focal length, you halve the width. All quoted figures are a close approximation as different machines may have slightly different apertures, but they are close enough for all practical purposes. Martin
-------------------- Retired TV Service Engineer Ongoing interest in Telecine....