Posts: 5895
From: Bristol. United Kingdom
Registered: Oct 2007
posted January 12, 2008 04:15 AM
When I buy projectors they come with a lens. It's something I never really think about. A lens is a lens. Or is it?
I recently bought an Elmo GS800 which came with a 1.1 lens. I was completely astounded to see my usual test film running. Yes, I suppose it was brighter, but it was the clarity and colour of the picture which so impressed me.
So I must thank Claus for recently drawing my attention to the German eBay listing for a Xenovaron 1.1. This I have purchased to fit on my Bauer T510. After reading comments on the Forum I am now expecting even better results from this super projector.
Is this a point of "you gets what yer pays for"? I always assumed that a faster lens would just give more light on the screen but I was obviously wrong. What have I been missing all this time.
Can anyone explain why these lens are so good? Is it their optics or higher quality construction?
posted January 12, 2008 05:06 AM
I think that a lot of it is down to the precision they are made with. An f1.3 lens doesnt have to be made with the same precision that an f1.1 or 1.0 lens does. The f1.0 and 1.1 has to be made to give better flatness of field over the small image area as the depth of field is very much smaller than with say an f1.3
As the 1.3 is more of a mass produced lens coating and tolerances dont have to be so spot on because a lot of it is lost due to the large depth of focus they have. Notice that a lot of 1.3 lenses such as the Elmo's are in fact plastic bodied but then when you move up to the 1.1 and 1.0's they are metal bodied as more care is taken with the manufacture of them.
Kev.
-------------------- GS1200 Xenon with Elmo 1.0...great combo along with a 16-CL Xenon for that super bright white light.
Posts: 5895
From: Bristol. United Kingdom
Registered: Oct 2007
posted January 12, 2008 06:28 AM
Hello Lee
I always think that if a projector still has its original box and all packing, plus accessories and of course, the instruction book, then it must have had a very careful owner.
Posts: 1149
From: Washington DC
Registered: Oct 2006
posted January 12, 2008 08:59 AM
Maurice,
You are very welcome; I am happy to see that my post had the intended effect: to get this fine lens into the hands of 'one of us' who can appreciate it, as opposed to going someplace where it might not be used to its advantage.
Give us an update when you receive it and let us know how it works for you.
Best, Claus.
-------------------- "Why are there shots of deserts in a scene that's supposed to take place in Belgium during the winter?" (Review of 'Battle of the Bulge'.)
I started using a 1.1 lens on my old ST1200 over 20years ago, a big improvement brightness and sharpness wise over the 1.3, the 1.1 is a bit more critical on focusing, for myself, using a good quality lens would be the most important item on a projector.
posted January 13, 2008 03:12 PM
Say, you should try the 11-30 on a noris special-D, standard 8 looks stunning, especially filmed thru a bolex. Have also found that a noris machine gives better edge to edge sharpness when compared to my bauers coupled with the 11-30
Posts: 4001
From: New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2006
posted January 13, 2008 03:34 PM
Hi Maurice Years ago I wrote all this information down in a book, I think it came from an old "Movie Maker" and I guess at the time the proper "ESC" lamp would have been used, it was claimed that you got 25% more light on the screen with the 1.1. I remember when I first used the lens I was so impressed with it on the ST1200 that I have never used anything else since.