8mm Forum: Claws on dual 8 machines

»	8mm Forum » 8mm Forum » Claws on dual 8 machines

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!

Author

Topic: Claws on dual 8 machines

Martin Jones
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1269
From: Thetford , Norfolk,England
Registered: May 2008

posted August 24, 2009 02:08 PM

Can anyone offer a simple explanation (or point me in the direction of one or a previous discussion) on how the different claw positioning and pulldown standards are implemented on dual machines?

--------------------
Retired TV Service Engineer
Ongoing interest in Telecine....

| IP: Logged

frank arnstein
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 534
From: Gold Coast. Australia
Registered: Jan 2005

posted August 24, 2009 09:25 PM

Hi martin
there is a thread that has a reference to the guage changing on a dual 8mm Elmo GP-E, some weeks back.
It was about focus problems after changing guages.
It mentions the 2 side guides in the gate and how they can be moved sideways by the selector to locate the film correctly, in relation to the aperture & sprockets.
As for the claw movement, it remains the same for both guages.
The claw sweep is dependent on the profile of the cam that drives it. You can't alter that. The depth that the claw penetrates into the film sprocket is usually adjustable by sliding the shutterwheel along the shuttershaft.
The sideways location of the claw tip is adjustable by a small cam near the claw pivot.
The framing is simply done by sliding the pressure plate up or down the gate, moving the frame till its perfect.
Hope that helps.
dogtor pufferfish [Smile]

[ August 25, 2009, 12:31 AM: Message edited by: frank arnstein ]

--------------------
At Projector Heaven the Focus is always on Detail.

____
[o:/o]<|=- dogtor@projectorheaven.com.au
//``\\
-----------------------------------------------

| IP: Logged

John Whittle
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 791
From: Northridge, CA USA
Registered: Jun 2003

posted August 25, 2009 01:35 PM

Note to Frank,

Actually the claw travel has to be different for Super8 and Reg8. The pitch of regular 8mm is .1500 (half of 16mm release print pitch of .3000) and the pitch of super 8 is .1667 so it can be seen that the claw set for a regular 8mm pull down will not position itself for entry in the super8 perforation on return.

Most of the dual machines I've seen will position the claw slightly toward the outside edge (guide edge) of the film thus getting a little more pull down for Super8 than regular8. Also the claws for these machines are really very small pins and all are single claw units. That way some of the error for over pull down on 8mm will be made up by entering the claw into clear space on the return and just sliding into position on Super8. Also an adjustment has to be made for framing since the frame line on regular 8 is on the center of the perforation whereas Super8 perforations are in the center of the frame.

John

| IP: Logged

frank arnstein
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 534
From: Gold Coast. Australia
Registered: Jan 2005

posted August 25, 2009 05:57 PM

Thanks John,
for that in depth explanation of claw operation.
I was trying to keep it simple but it ain't that simple & the points you raised & explained are much appreciated.
We never stop learning more about this great hobby & we try to help each other on this forum.

dogtor pufferfish
[Smile]

--------------------
At Projector Heaven the Focus is always on Detail.

____
[o:/o]<|=- dogtor@projectorheaven.com.au
//``\\
-----------------------------------------------

| IP: Logged

Alexander Lechner
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 118
From: Leoben, Austria
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 06, 2009 03:46 PM

Hi John!
I have to correct you here: having a closer look at my Eumigs Mark 501, 602 D and 610 D, I have to tell you that they are all projectors for Super 8 and Standard 8 and they all have dual claw systems.
The clue is that the two claws are quite far apart (I measured 37.5 mm) because that's where the sprocket holes of Super 8 and Standard 8 meet again; so actually one claw is above the gate and the other one below ...

--------------------
Alex

| IP: Logged

frank arnstein
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 534
From: Gold Coast. Australia
Registered: Jan 2005

posted September 06, 2009 09:21 PM

Hi Alex,
An interesting point you raise....
I have had a close look at the Eumigs to see how they work.

The Eumigs you speak of do not have the usual top sprocket to push film towards the aperture.
So they use a special reciprocating, sliding claw mount setup using 2 fingers wide apart. The top claw finger is reponsible for catching the film as its loaded & then dragging it into the film gate & pushing it past the aperture towards the 2nd claw finger. Once its caught there, the film is secured between 2 pins, one above and below the aperture. The top claw finger does what the top sprocket used to do. The bottom one is responsible for pull down as is usual.
So it really only uses a 1 fingered claw for pulldown, mounted onto the same sliding claw bracket as the top claw finger, which catches then pushes down film & also holds each frame stretched flat as it passes the aperture.
The 800 series of Eumigs went back to the conventional Top Sprocket setup. The claws on them were 2 fingered & close to each other. The pins are like thin needles so they will do Super or Reg & still get into the film sprocket holes, using either guage.
A different gate is used for sideways location of reg. 8 film.
Both of these needle like fingers do pulldown only, as the top sprocket pushed film down to it.
When the 900 series Eumigs came out, the Sprockets went away again and the weird, sliding claw mount had returned.
So this is 1 reason why your claw fingers are so far apart. They have to be that far apart or it wouldn't self thread itself.
They also happen to coincide with either guage at that distance apart, as you have pointed out.

dogtor pufferfish
[Razz]

--------------------
At Projector Heaven the Focus is always on Detail.

____
[o:/o]<|=- dogtor@projectorheaven.com.au
//``\\
-----------------------------------------------

| IP: Logged

Joerg Niggemann
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 127
From: Germany
Registered: May 2006

posted September 07, 2009 02:12 AM

Hi all,
one more reason why these Eumigs have to use an additional claw under the gate: since they don't have any sprocket wheels, the film has to be pulled out of the gate by the second claw at its end to avoid burning of the last frame. The takeup reel won't do that because the torque is adjusted very low with these machines, again because sprocket wheel is missing and takeup directly affects claw transport.

Joerg

| IP: Logged

Martin Jones
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1269
From: Thetford , Norfolk,England
Registered: May 2008

posted September 07, 2009 04:50 AM

Well, that provoked a most interesting discussion. I learnt a lot, and I hope others did too. It's interesting also to realise from such a discussion the wide range of expertise in other fields that exists in the fraternity; is this because cinematography embraces so many other disiplines by virtue of it's very nature?
Martin

--------------------
Retired TV Service Engineer
Ongoing interest in Telecine....

| IP: Logged

All times are Central

Printer-friendly view of this topic

UBB.classic^TM 6.3.1.2