Posts: 118
From: Leoben, Austria
Registered: Apr 2009
posted January 28, 2010 05:45 AM
I have used both the 50 and the 100 ASA films by Kahl and with the 100 ASA one I would also guess that it is Ektachrome. I doubt very much that the 50 ASA film is Fuji Velvia, it doesn't really fit colour impression wise; what gets me with the 50 ASA Kahl stock is that it doesn't produce the same "sharpness" that the 100 ASA stock does.
Posts: 1149
From: Washington DC
Registered: Oct 2006
posted January 29, 2010 01:26 PM
Since we are talking Kahl: I have looked at their fine-grain B/W film offerings, and I was curious, but since I can't find anyone who has tried those stocks, and since Kahl wants to develop the film themselves, it doesn't seem practical for me in the US.
Claus.
-------------------- "Why are there shots of deserts in a scene that's supposed to take place in Belgium during the winter?" (Review of 'Battle of the Bulge'.)
Posts: 1149
From: Washington DC
Registered: Oct 2006
posted January 29, 2010 06:21 PM
Bart,
Thank you for that heads-up! I am just about to try some Pro-8 stocks, so next time around I will look for that very slow one.
Claus.
-------------------- "Why are there shots of deserts in a scene that's supposed to take place in Belgium during the winter?" (Review of 'Battle of the Bulge'.)
posted January 30, 2010 06:55 AM
........is there any chance we'll see Kahl or any other company exporting 8mm here in the UK and breaking the monopoly of Kodak 64 at all??
Posts: 118
From: Leoben, Austria
Registered: Apr 2009
posted January 30, 2010 12:26 PM
Hi Michael! Here are two screenshots (off a film editor - that's why they are so bad ), the first E64T (Super8) and the second one Kahl UT18 (Standard8). My opinion is that the colours on the Kahl are very natural but there is always the issue with the sharpness; E64T's colours are very strong and the grain is much more obvious. Ektachrome 64T: