Author
|
Topic: My XMas Shoot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Winbert Hutahaean
Film God
Posts: 5468
From: Nouméa, New Caledonia
Registered: Jun 2003
|
posted February 16, 2010 09:25 AM
Christian,
Finally....
My comments are:
1. As we have discussed earlier, you need a movie light for indoor shooting. As your result shows that nothing much can be done if relied only on domestic light (too dark).
2. My result for indoor shooting without a movie light gave a good result because the church hall was equipped with very high wattage lamps (should be measured in Kelvin though, but I don't have a gear for that)
3. Your outdoor shooting looks pretty dark, while I can see the sun is there. You should open the iris much wider.
4. As I already mentioned in the other thread, E64T is best used with a filter 85B during the winter season. You will get color corrected rather than the bluish tint you have now. I bought it from Ebay for only $2 (Hoya).
5. I guessed whatever people say about the current E64T, it must be lesser quality than the previous K40 or E160 in 1990s. Your first 6 seconds must be from old batch, right. You can see the sensitivity of that print compared with today's E64T. I don't know why, noting that K40 is only ASA 40 vs E64T which is ASA 64. Probably old lab/chemical was also better than now.
Good luck with your other 4 shootings. Share with us.
cheers
-------------------- Winbert
| IP: Logged
|
|
Christian Bjorgen
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 996
From: Kvinnherad, Norway
Registered: Oct 2009
|
posted February 16, 2010 10:27 AM
Hi, Winbert, and thanks for your comments! I have some answers myself
1. Yes, I need a movie light, but I can't afford one right now The film is however not as dark as it looks. When projected with the Elmo, you can see things quite clearly, even in the dark parts. Just a poor digitalization job.
3. OK, thanks for the advice. I filmed this with the exposure set to "Auto". But as mentioned, it looks quite different when projected for real.
4. Yes, I'm aware of this, but I'm not too bothered by the tint, as it's alot less noticeable on the actual reel. With my current economic situation I'm not gonna prioritize on getting another filter anyway
5. Yes, the first 6 seconds is from an old K40 reel that I forgot to cut away before uploading. Those seconds were however filmed with a movie light and a really expensive Canon camera, and so the quality is alot better
-------------------- Well who’s on first? Yeah. Go ahead and tell me. Who. The guy on first. Who. The guy playin’ first base. Who. The guy on first. Who is on first! What are you askin’ me for? I’m askin’ you!
| IP: Logged
|
|
David Erskine
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 230
From: Letchworth Garden City, Herts
Registered: Aug 2008
|
posted February 16, 2010 11:42 AM
If you want a movie light, I've got one on eBay (UK) starting at £7.99!!!!! Item No: 300396053243 ('cos I don't know how to put links in). I said "A Kaiser product (no 'Fawlty Towers' jokes!) fitted with barndoors and has a handle with standard screwhole for stand mounting. I used this a few times when filming relatives wedding, etc. It was working fine when I plugged in and switched on yesterday. My starting bid is low but realistic. (You know, I've always been worried that if I started at 99p I might find I'd end at that!)" Someone sent a question:- " Hi there, Sounds a silly question, but what kind/colour range of light is this please? Is it Metal Halide, Mercury Vapour, etc...and any rating info on the box." I answered "I got it from WideScreen Centre - for film type filming! - and it says on the box that it is:- 1000 watts, extremely low noise blower cooling, special diffuser glass for extra soft lighting, 4 large barn doors for directional lighting, tiltable handle with 1/4" mounting thread, camera bracket and halogen lamp of 3400K." It's got about a day and a couple of hours to go - if you are interested. Might be useful? You have my email addy, Christian. Cheers, David E
-------------------- I've NEVER let failure go to MY head!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|