Posts: 7016
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
posted February 18, 2011 09:21 AM
It looks exactly like my ST-800M other than the labling and the M/O selector switch above the transport control selector.
Hey Daniel,
Could you shoot a picture showing the area around the sound heads? (thanks)
-------------------- All I ask is a wide screen and a projector to light her by...
posted February 18, 2011 09:41 AM
The sound system looks like the ST1200's, with the same exciter lamp. I'll post a picture later (I need some time...).
Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004
posted February 18, 2011 02:55 PM
Fascinating - I've never seen one of these. Whilst I'm delighted that there are plenty of Elmos in circulation, from an economic point of view, I'm baffled that they considered it worthwhile making so many different models with slight variations. E.g. I don't suppose the cost of making this one was very different to the 600' equivalent, so did it really make sense to make both?
Posts: 7016
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
posted February 19, 2011 09:48 AM
As far as I know, this is about 90% equivalent to the ST-600. As a matter of fact without the large hubbed (Elmo or Gepe) 800 Foot takeup reel it will not rewind a full 800 foot reel of film but stall 600+ feet in. That end of the machine is probably pure ST-600.
I think Elmo saw it as an in-between for the ST-600 and the ST-1200. I operate mine side by side with my ST-1200HD equipped with an 800 foot takeup reel and (usually)the lamp set low and they are a pretty well matched pair.
-------------------- All I ask is a wide screen and a projector to light her by...
Posts: 7016
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
posted February 19, 2011 12:56 PM
Thanks for the photo Daniel!,
This end of the sound system is very close to being the same as the ST-800M (-other than the obvious...). It has the same film chute, which unfortunately I've been told is both unique to the ST-800 and is a wear point. The curved edge up at the entrance of the chute tends to wear an edge where it flattens the lower loop and if it goes far enough it can put lines into the viewable frame.
I also have half-baked theory that this wear allows the film to pulsate up and down on the (magnetic) heads a tiny bit and makes the 24 FPS chatter that much worse. My only evidence for this is the fact that replacing the chute cut this way, way back.
The chute now in my machine has very little wear on it, and I try to lube it regularly to keep it that way. This isn't a crisis though: my first chute took 30 years to reach the point of being unservicable. The new one should last me to about 2039 at that rate! (That's 77 years old for me!)
-------------------- All I ask is a wide screen and a projector to light her by...