Author
|
Topic: Number of prints for each title released (post 1985 production)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian Winchester
Film God
Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004
|
posted December 25, 2011 11:49 AM
I agree it would be unwise to probe too much into legal issues, at least with regard to anything that happened in the last 25 years ago, so maybe Winbert could edit out the line in question. Regarding 'Close Encounters' the version I heard was that Columbia strongly objected when they discovered Derann offering one or more of their films on a 16mm list and cancelled their whole deal with them. If there's any truth in this, it seems extreme nowadays with hundreds of 16mm featurers on open sale, but it was more of a grey area then. Derann did stop selling 16mm for quite a while at this time.
I'd agree that in theory one or two distributors - perhaps in particular Disney could still have some documentation regarding royalties from Super 8 sales, considering the last payment may have been only about three years ago. But getting the information would still be a challenge; you would need to find which division had the details and even if you did, you would have to hope that they would be willing to reveal the information, and would be willing to spend the time needed to look into it. I doubt if adding to the known history of 8mm would be an incentive! I vaguely recall Ged once telling me that 20th Century Fox didn't require any detailed breakdown of prints, so probably no hope there. [ December 26, 2011, 01:49 AM: Message edited by: Adrian Winchester ]
-------------------- Adrian Winchester
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|