Author
|
Topic: More conflicting information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian Winchester
Film God
Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004
|
posted July 04, 2013 04:04 PM
I don't personally have a problem with card boxes and I'm inclined to think the 'dangers' are exaggerated, but many people have a perspective based on their own experience. I know of a collector who once had a chance to check films in a storage place where VS had afflicted nearly all the films, but he found a couple in platic cans which were OK. In that particular instance, cans that were more or less airtight appeared to have saved the films from VS, but of course many would suggest not using cans - unless they are archival cans - as the films can't 'breath', so you can't generalise. And any type of cans are considered OK for polyester films. Some 16mm collectors strongly advocate not using cans or boxes, saying that dust is a much lesser problem than VS, but my collection is already chaotic enough - I'd never cope with storing everything out of containers!
-------------------- Adrian Winchester
| IP: Logged
|
|
Hugh Thompson Scott
Film God
Posts: 3063
From: Gt. Clifton,Cumbria,England
Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted July 04, 2013 06:46 PM
Adrian, that say's it all, conditions apply.Although super 8 film for home movie use is different from the prints supplied to collectors, I would say that for collectors in warm regions, keep film in card, or open, in cooler climate in cans.Remember that camera film is different to commercial, so no deterioration should occur .
| IP: Logged
|
|
|