8mm Forum: KEMPSKI Lists : here to Download !!!!

This is topic KEMPSKI Lists : here to Download !!!! in forum 8mm Forum at 8mm Forum.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://8mmforum.film-tech.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=011036

Posted by Phil Murat (Member # 5148) on October 13, 2016, 11:22 AM:

Goodmorning,

Here are some lists (Newsletters) from Dietrich Kempski.

Prices in Deutsche Mark.

KEMPSKI LISTS / NEWSLETTER

"Lightweight" File (5 Mo) (scanned in Color mode / 600dpi)

Available 15 days from today

Enjoy it !!

[ October 13, 2016, 12:42 PM: Message edited by: Phil Murat ]

Posted by Osi Osgood (Member # 424) on October 13, 2016, 12:24 PM:

As a person who is attempting to write an article on Kempski ... THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!

Posted by Phil Murat (Member # 5148) on October 13, 2016, 12:43 PM:

Hello Osi,

Here is an other one........

KEMPSKI NEWSLETTER

And just for the fun......... :

Kempski "envelope"

[ October 13, 2016, 01:48 PM: Message edited by: Phil Murat ]

Posted by Andrew Woodcock (Member # 3260) on October 13, 2016, 02:01 PM:

Great stuff Phil!

They shall be downloaded and treasured along with all my other catalogues from the major players.

Many Thanks Phil. [Smile]

Posted by Phil Murat (Member # 5148) on October 13, 2016, 02:06 PM:

Hi Andrew and Osi,

I am happy you appreciate !!

There are already around 20 downloads done .....

Newsletters and Lists are from 88/89 .

You need an other one ???? !!!!

KEMPSKI NEWSLETTER 2

Posted by Phil Murat (Member # 5148) on October 14, 2016, 02:49 AM:

Kempski" files , sucessful downloadings :

Today, more than 50 downloadings already done !!

[ October 14, 2016, 01:54 PM: Message edited by: Phil Murat ]

Posted by Osi Osgood (Member # 424) on October 14, 2016, 11:58 AM:

Believe me Phil, you don't have to tell me about how good kempski prints were, and still are! These low fade wonders, in my opinion, really set the "bar' high for super 8, even with what Derann was producing!

I would even go as far as to say that they were better as, Derann reprinted a number of Kempski's titles, but the Kempski prints of the same title, were better than the Derann print of a Kempski title.

I'm sure that there are some who would disagree with that, but from what i have seen, I think that it's true.

Thank you for that second Kempski file. SUPER!!

Posted by Andrew Woodcock (Member # 3260) on October 14, 2016, 02:19 PM:

Your last statement there is true in almost every case I've seen Osi and that includes Red Fox prints also.

Let's not forget, Derann only acquired whatever material was left from these dealers when they ceased trading, so logic says, the negatives were at their best when they were first used to make prints by their original owners as opposed to Derann's era with these.

Either way, there are no bad prints from any of these negatives that I've seen, just varying degrees of excellence! [Smile]

[ October 14, 2016, 05:02 PM: Message edited by: Andrew Woodcock ]

Posted by Brian Fretwell (Member # 4302) on October 14, 2016, 02:51 PM:

Many thanks Phil.

Posted by Phil Murat (Member # 5148) on October 14, 2016, 03:40 PM:

Hi Brian,
Its my pleasure, you're welcome .

Osi, I understand . Putting screenshots wasn't especially for you as I imagine you know Kempski material but for many others members (some of them are pretty young) whom have never eared of Him.

Considering the difference between printing results frome a same negative processed and in different contions, it could be interesting to know what are the Duplicating Bench used by a laboratory or an other.

Is there a TIP somewhere for that (Type of benches, how they work, etc,etc...) ?
And then, how many copies is it possible to do reasonnably with a good negative ?

As I remember Derann was working with a Dual Copy machine and Kempski subcontracted the work with a laboratory using a 2x2 copy machine (I don't know where it was in Germany).
I had been given a short "raw" sample of that work (I am afraid to have lost it, unfortunately) for Ben Hur release.
So 3 spleeting are necessary in this case instead of 1 for Derann process.

May be I miss something , is there anybody to confirm?

Hi Andrew,
Concerning "RED FOX" I rember ("North By Northwest" ??) and "The Three Mouseketeers" ,more particularly,(were) was considered the best print(s) ever made in Super 8, is it correct ?

Posted by Flavio Stabile (Member # 357) on October 14, 2016, 03:50 PM:

Many Thanks from me too! [Wink]

Posted by Phil Murat (Member # 5148) on October 14, 2016, 03:55 PM:

Hi Flavio,

you are welcome too !! [Wink]

As I am still there, are you using an ELMO GS 1200 PCOM ?

Posted by Andrew Woodcock (Member # 3260) on October 14, 2016, 05:04 PM:

El Cid I reckon is considered the best of the best Phil

Either way, we're splitting hairs, they are all magnificent by the time we get to these standards on a Super 8mm feature print! [Wink]

Derann did split their prints in two after printing, what method Kempski or anyone else in USA / Germany used.. I have no idea Phil.

Posted by Osi Osgood (Member # 424) on October 15, 2016, 12:00 PM:

Well, there you go! Now, I have to look for a Red Fox print of "The Two Mousketeers"!

UBB.classic^TM 6.3.1.2