Posts: 4837
From: Plymouth U.K
Registered: Dec 2003
posted July 14, 2017 01:45 PM
£212 Stuart, 40 quid a piece which isn't too far over the top as they do seem to fetch stupid money. Have to say i would not pay that, (i'd sell them for it though )
Posts: 4837
From: Plymouth U.K
Registered: Dec 2003
posted July 15, 2017 11:05 AM
Fortunatly the ad reels on there, 9 and 12 are already in my collection along with saving private ryan trailer. I think i paid £12 each and 14 for the trailer. Back in the day as they say. The earlier reel we had but sold them on. A nice little xollection there though.
I was curious more to see what was offered. It took me years to actually track down a Derann re-issue on low fade film stock of the Red Fox "70's commercials (U.S.)" (which red Fox originally only issued on quick fade eastman, alas), and I'm always in the hopes of finding the second red Fox release of the 70's commercials reels, and the hope that Derann also re-iisued that one as well on L.P.P. film stock. hey, they re-issued one of them, there's the hope that they re-issued the other one as well.
-------------------- "All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "
Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004
posted July 15, 2017 06:40 PM
Mark - you're taking kindness to saintly proportions if you would only charge a buyer half their winning bid, before then paying eBay commission on the full amount! I bet every other Forum member would gratefully accept the money, thinking it's some compensation for all the times we've got less than we deserved when selling films!
Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004
posted July 17, 2017 12:10 PM
Mark - I take your point, but on the other hand I don't think it would imply a lack of kindness to accept the winning bid, and it could be that a low-income seller really needs the money a lot more than a wealthy buyer.
Setting a 'Buy it now' approach does seem to be the answer to avoid getting more than you want, although that may prevent a buyer from getting a bargain, as well as saving them from paying an inflated price.
Posts: 93
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Registered: Nov 2015
posted July 17, 2017 11:02 PM
Mark - would that really be fair to all the other bidders who were also willing to pay "too much" for your item? Shouldn't it go to the bidder who was first to reach your threshold?