|
Author
|
Topic: So, Is is a dupe, and was it worth my money?
|
John Davey
Junior
Posts: 25
From: Chesterton, Indiana USA
Registered: Nov 2004
|
posted December 08, 2004 12:02 AM
I just recieved a 16mm print of "Wizard of Oz" that I am pretty sure is a (really bad) bootleg dupe, but I thought I'd ask the experts to be sure.
First of all, it would seem to have been duped from a 35mm print as the cue marks are printed in, and the film looks filthy at the reel changes. Is also has bad contrast, it seems to have a look of being "overexposed" (to bright). The second thing is it has printed in leaders that title it as "Magician", which I am assuming was done to throw off any authorities who discovered the prints(s), as foreign CD bootleggers do today to get the CD's through customs.
The color also shifts from, fair in the first two reels (it's a four reeler) to red in the last two reels.
Now, I only paid $200 for it, which I thought was a steal until I got it. I know good prints go for $500 and up. On top of all of these problems it seems to be badly warped( however this did not affect the image except for the first couple of minnutes of reel 4). When I received it all 4 of the reels were wound extremely loose and were sagging. When I projected it, it sagged even worse on the take up reel. (Half of reel 3 wound up on the floor because I was in the other room from the projector and it sagged so bad it started spooling off the reel!!! I didn't realize it til the reel was over and I went to change the reels. Woah, that was not a pretty sight!)
Anyway, I guess I am also asking from the wise ones, would you ask for an adjustment on this print if it were you? I think I would like to keep the print and ask for part of my money back( I mean, when will I be able to afford a GOOD print of Oz?) as the warping was not disclosed to me and i was told it had "decent" color. However, it's very possible I am just letting my dissapointment get the best of me. I mean, we are talking about "Wizard of Oz", one of the most desireable prints in film land, for only $200. I probably shoudln't expect much for a $200 print.
So, whaddya guys think?
Thanks,
John Davey
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
