Author
|
Topic: Blue Ray a non starter?
|
|
|
|
Jan Bister
Darth 8mm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db91e/db91e73fb39f2d1a462cf7520fcbe47d316609e9" alt=""
Posts: 2629
From: Ohio, USA
Registered: Jan 2005
|
posted July 15, 2006 09:57 AM
If I'm understanding the article correctly, the quality difference between Blu-Ray and HD-DVD is partly due to the fact that Blu-Ray still uses MPEG2 for video encoding, rather than the more advanced MPEG4/VC1 codec. Since MPEG2 yields relatively large amounts of data, particularly at these high resolutions, the 25GB capacity of the Blu-Ray disc seems to be a limiting factor in terms of bit rate and thus, video quality/absence of encoding artifacts.
As for Blu-Ray being included in Sony's PS3, not sure if that's really going to matter to movie aficionados. Unless capable Blu-Ray drives come out for PCs and Macs (and can beat HD-DVD storage), I see no reason why HD-DVD shouldn't in fact beat out Blu-Ray both in movies and data storage - in fact delegating Blu-Ray to just another video game format in the process.
Anyway, these are just my impressions from all I'm reading so far, and I still have to see for myself what either format is (and will be) capable of doing. Then again, this format war may well be decided by the opinions that end up prevailing with the mass consumers, and not by the actual strengths and weaknesses of each format. Sounds familiar, right? But what may be different this time around is that the superior format may actually win. We'll see...
-------------------- Call me Phoenix. *dusts off the ashes*
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|