Posts: 260
From: Lanoka Harbor, NJ, USA
Registered: Sep 2009
posted May 11, 2013 12:04 PM
Once again, Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford & Carrie Fisher are NOT signed on.
Yes, it seems likely they will be in it but it's not a foregone conclusion yet.
Although Ford and Fisher have been silent lately, Hamill has said just this week that he has had meetings but no offer yet.
Untill an official announcement is made then it's not happening.
I'm probably more excitied for this movie than many but let's not jump the gun here. Patience.
-------------------- My crummy Deviant Art account. Read my poetic tribute to the internet comic strip Ozy & Millie and view my crappy attempts at art.
Posts: 260
From: Lanoka Harbor, NJ, USA
Registered: Sep 2009
posted May 11, 2013 11:00 PM
I didn't say otherwise. Read my post again.
I only said that none of them are signed on yet. Mark Hamill sure does not have a deal as noted in this quote from a recent article:
quote:Hamill confirmed "they're talking to us," when asked directly about his involvement in the new film, though interestingly revealed that George Lucas is at the forefront of the casting process. "George [Lucas] wanted to know whether we'd be interested. He did say that if we didn't want to do it, they wouldn't cast another actor in our parts - they would write us out. I can tell you right away that we haven't signed any contracts."
I'm just not one to believe rumors. When an official announcement is made, THEN I'll get excitied.
-------------------- My crummy Deviant Art account. Read my poetic tribute to the internet comic strip Ozy & Millie and view my crappy attempts at art.
Posts: 3063
From: Gt. Clifton,Cumbria,England
Registered: Jan 2012
posted May 12, 2013 04:04 AM
It's all about deals,frachises and tax breaks without a mention of creativity.The article fails to mention that the original film was made at Pinewood.Like the majority of films now,it'll be noisy,lots of explosions and little storyline.At least we still have the first three.
Posts: 260
From: Lanoka Harbor, NJ, USA
Registered: Sep 2009
posted May 13, 2013 12:39 PM
Hugh, you do realize that the original Star Wars trilogy was often critized for exactly the things you attributed to "modern" films?
Maurice, "due to return" means nothing. Bill Murray was "due to return" for Ghostbusters III but Dan Ackroyd just announced today that the movie will be made without Bill.
Like I said, yes they probably will be in it but untill an official announcement is made it's all rumors.
-------------------- My crummy Deviant Art account. Read my poetic tribute to the internet comic strip Ozy & Millie and view my crappy attempts at art.
Posts: 3063
From: Gt. Clifton,Cumbria,England
Registered: Jan 2012
posted May 13, 2013 01:47 PM
Can't recall any adverse criticism of the Star Wars films this side of the Atlantic Thomas, they were acclaimed by all and sundry. The point I'm making is that all these films now have nothing new to offer,it's been done to death,which is why plots are wafer thin and massive explosions serve to cover up non existant storyline.
Posts: 3216
From: The Projection Box
Registered: Nov 2006
posted September 26, 2013 08:49 AM
I’m a guessing JJ wants to try and get back to a more original Star Wars look than a digital effects laden blast in 4K. I know most are on about the end of 35mm film but we can only hold up the new range of super 8 film stock as a pretty good example of something that will not die. Crumbs we still have a few good choices with 9.5mm camera film as well!