Nice to see someone making the effort, and for the right reasons: to preserve what is a unique and timeless production format.
Claus
-------------------- "Why are there shots of deserts in a scene that's supposed to take place in Belgium during the winter?" (Review of 'Battle of the Bulge'.)
posted July 30, 2014 05:49 PM
While it selfishly does my film heart good to hear of the development, the Wall Street Journal reports that Kodak's motion picture film sales have plummeted 96 percent since 2006. Wow. A business can't be expected to sustain those type of losses, no matter how much one pines for the days of yore.
posted July 30, 2014 08:04 PM
Don't let's forget we're in a time when even digital's becoming obsolete, & the future is the cloud-they say; so whatever prolongs the existence of film as medium is good news...
posted July 31, 2014 01:38 PM
Saw this comment from a reader of the related Wall Street Journal article: "It would be ironic if Kodak were saved so that it could continue to produce film, given that the reason it's in bankruptcy is precisely because it did continue to produce film."
Posts: 247
From: St. Louis, Missouri USA
Registered: Dec 2009
posted July 31, 2014 07:40 PM
I believe at some point, new methods incorporating 3D printing will be integrated to revolutionize film manufacturing into the 21st century, with the result of multiple emulsion choices at lower costs than ever before.......a game changer for the motion picture industry.
Posts: 247
From: St. Louis, Missouri USA
Registered: Dec 2009
posted August 05, 2014 09:13 AM
A company named Organovo is already 3-D printing human tissues for the eventual goal to use in transplant surgery. It seems that technology would make film emulsions a piece of cake. One hundred years from now... movies will still be made on film.