Posts: 93
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Registered: Nov 2015
posted October 19, 2016 02:25 PM
The price is appealing, but the quality just isn't there. I don't mind that it looks like something from Fisher-Price. I don't mind that it takes half an hour to digitize a 50-foot reel. And I don't mind that the file runs at 30 frames per second - that can be adjusted later. But the image itself - the part that really matters - is very poor, full of digital noise, on par with old-school video CD.
Posts: 740
From: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2014
posted October 19, 2016 03:32 PM
@ Ty well said! The capability and parts to make a HD digital capture are dirtcheap these days...why they cheaped out on that part i don't know...I'd like to see someone modify it to do what it should...very nice concept however, and perhaps time will improve it more...
Posts: 543
From: Herne Bay, Kent. U.K.
Registered: Oct 2011
posted October 20, 2016 11:36 AM
Quote "Your 8mm and Super 8 films are degrading. Worse, the memories are fading and going brittle." REALLY!!! Where did they get that idea from ? Not in my experience. Ken Finch. :
posted October 20, 2016 11:46 AM
I agree with you Ken. I have Cinecolor cartoon prints from well over 70 or so years ago, and they are still as vibrant as the day they were printed and not a bit brittle.
-------------------- "All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "