Posts: 955
From: Johnshaven Village , Montrose, Scotland
Registered: Jan 2015
posted June 07, 2017 03:50 AM
If you like this kind of stuff and have not seen it. Go see it at the Cinema or Movie Theatre on a really BIG SCREEN. It is an outstanding movie and the best of the DC superhero films to date.
It is also one of the best anti-war films I have seen.
-------------------- " My equipment's more important than your rats. "
posted June 07, 2017 10:04 AM
I thought the CGI wasn't very good and all in all a bit of a lack lustre affair - Chris Pine has been served better and Gal Gadot although looking the part - her dreadful accent and delivery spoilt it for me and my daughter.
Posts: 606
From: Galveston, Texas, U.S.A.
Registered: Mar 2007
posted June 08, 2017 12:27 PM
I enjoyed the movie myself. As to her accent, I think she absolutely nailed the Amazonian dialect. She is certainly a stunning beauty.
posted June 08, 2017 01:18 PM
BTW, they showed a picture of Lynda Carter (original TV Wonder Woman) and the new wonder woman together, and she (Lynda) is still quite the beauty!
-------------------- "All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "
posted June 08, 2017 02:53 PM
Amazonian Dialect !!!! She had a French Accent and she was pretty useless - even though she looked good - good looks don't make up for a lack of talent in this role
Posts: 2211
From: New York City, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
posted June 13, 2017 05:53 AM
I saw this in my local cinema in ....70mm! Real film. I thought it was great. She looked beautiful, her acting while not perfect was heartfelt and her sincerity in many of the scenes came through. The villain was a little over the top but was made up for by the fantastic battle sequences where she rushed into a field with only her shield, her sword, and of course her perfect hair! One of the better DC films I have seen to date since the original Dark Night. I prefer Patty Jenkins touch to Zack Snyder's.
posted June 13, 2017 08:14 AM
How did the 70mm print look ? I suppose the film was finished as Digital Intermediate and not photochemical (opposed as to what Christoper Nolan is doing with Dunkirk)
Posts: 2211
From: New York City, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2003
posted June 14, 2017 01:10 AM
The film looked very sharp. I can't make a comparison to the Digital version but I saw "Kong:Skull Island" in both 70mm and Digital and the 70mm looked much sharper and smoother to my eyes. You can really tell the difference when you see a landscape shot-the 70mm had more detail than the digital. I saw Kong in this same theatre.