Posts: 1423
From: Weymouth,Dorset,England
Registered: Oct 2012
posted October 17, 2017 11:25 AM
Vic It's quite obvious that the wire you have used is of a higher resistance value than the original. Hence no speed when you activate the motor. You need to take a section of the original wire and get it tested to find its resistance value ( unless you have the facility to do it yourself). I wouldn't have thought it would be a problem to get some wire of similar resistance.
Posts: 41
From: Worcestershire, England
Registered: Dec 2015
posted October 17, 2017 11:31 AM
I've just bypassed the speed control to see what happens and the motor still runs slow, it's got the correct belt newly fitted, if I remove the belt the motor goes full speed, the mechanism turns freely enough so no idea what's happening here
Posts: 41
From: Worcestershire, England
Registered: Dec 2015
posted October 17, 2017 11:38 AM
Yes, it did run & project but the speed control didn't work properly because the resistance wire was broken in several places
I'm just wondering how free the motor should turn with the belt off, it's perhaps not as free as I would expect so maybe under load it struggles. When I ran it when I first got it it worked o.k with a couple of films but with another it was far too slow and that's why I'm trying to fix it
Posts: 1423
From: Weymouth,Dorset,England
Registered: Oct 2012
posted October 17, 2017 11:54 AM
I have had problems in the past with the 'correct ' belts. They are very thick and tend to put too much strain on the motor pulley, especially if they have gone out of shape over the years. I personally use nitrile belts which I make up myself from lengths of it which can be bought online. The original belts put unnecessary strain on the motor mounts which put the motor out of true and then causes slippage and other problems. The motor mounts are of rubber and degrade over age and they may also need replacement.
Posts: 41
From: Worcestershire, England
Registered: Dec 2015
posted October 17, 2017 01:23 PM
I got the belt from Grahame Newnham so it should be the correct one, I'm more convinced the motor should turn a bit easier, are the motors on the Gem sealed bearings ?
Posts: 1423
From: Weymouth,Dorset,England
Registered: Oct 2012
posted October 17, 2017 03:39 PM
Vic From memory I believe they are but you may be able to lubricate somewhat by placing drops onto the motor spindle. Personally I don't think the motor is the problem. I would check out the replacement windings on the speed control. With the belt removed the motor is not under load so it will run well but the real test is when it is under load with the belt on. All I can say is that when I replaced the original belt with a much thinner nitrile belt it made a huge difference to the performance.
Posts: 41
From: Worcestershire, England
Registered: Dec 2015
posted October 18, 2017 03:33 AM
Terry,
I've temporarily bypassed the speed control so it has no effect on what is causing the slow speed, I'm thinking now that perhaps there is a voltage drop to the motor
Posts: 1423
From: Weymouth,Dorset,England
Registered: Oct 2012
posted October 18, 2017 03:48 AM
Well if you have the means you can check that out, but my guess is that you are thinking too deep. Try the simple things first. If you remove the belt and the motor races and then you replace the belt and it is slow, then that should tell you something. Either there is slippage of the belt, or it is too tight, or the motor is at fault. Have you checked the motor alignment? Is the inching knob central in the front plate aperture or is it pulled to one side (towards the lens). If so the motor mounts need looking at.