Author
|
Topic: Looking At The Careers Of The Actors/Ress Who Have Left Us
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vidar Olavesen
Film God
Posts: 2232
From: Sarpsborg, Norway
Registered: Nov 2012
|
posted September 02, 2014 07:02 AM
I agree with David here ... There's something wrong about the way they make movies now. Of course they always wanted to make money, but now it seems like it's all about the money and nothing about the art of film making. Can you call someone holding a camera, jerking it in and out, left to right with no point to it whatsoever a Cinematographer? In my eyes, NO ... Anyone can film the way they do it today, and I think 95% of them do not know anything, just get a camera and point (and jerk it around). And the editing is the same. Are we supposed to be told a story and follow it? I can't follow todays films. For example, someone reads a note ... In proper, good old films, we saw what it said, now it's shown for less than a second. I have a suspicion, they do not know how to direct and act anymore, so they just cut to a different scene to cover up the foul ups. Manhattan, by Woody Allen, has scenes many minutes long and that takes acting skills. Brian De Palmas lovely camera movement in Raising Cain (or most of his older films for that matter) is outstanding. It's now a money grabbing video industry for me, not a film industry with people proud of what they do. Long live Harryhausen, De Palma, Allen and all those who know (knew?) how to make films the proper way
| IP: Logged
|
|
Osi Osgood
Film God
Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted September 02, 2014 01:07 PM
The funny thing is, it seems to me that Hollywood and the film-making public are more than capable of making absolutely beautiful films and technically, people have a host of things at they're disposal to make films look and sound incredible.
It's the story that really seems to be missing a lot of the time.
Back to actors ...
I always noticed that the actors of the past (at least "big ones"), not only had a distinguished look, "mystique" (as I mentioned earlier), but they even had a certain quality to they're voices.
You automatically KNEW Bogart, or Stewart (of the "Jimmy" variety) when you heard them on the radio. The same was true of many of the actresses. Could you ever confuse Katherine Hepburn for Mae Questel on the radio? Nope!
There ARE exceptions today, of course, but so many of the actors and actresses of today have very "generic" voices.
I find that most of my favorite actors and actresses today are the "second tier" or character actors, such as Steve Buscemi and the like.
-------------------- "All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|