Author
|
Topic: Am I reading this wrong or is it me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Photiou
Film God
Posts: 4837
From: Plymouth U.K
Registered: Dec 2003
|
posted January 27, 2019 04:51 AM
Good points from everyone on this, i do agree with Kevin that all aspects of a needs to have an explanation if there's any defects or fade etc.If anything, it protects the seller,which for all of is vital. There will always be someone who will say "you said the print was excellent but the colours faded, or theirs splices" etc. You know what some buyers are like Any listings i do from here on will now have a separate paragraph for print condition, sound and colour. While this may seem over the top, there will be no doubt form any potential buyers that i didn't list it.
Please remember, i'm not in any way picking fault or suggesting any dishonesty about the seller, merely looking at it as many potential sellers may. Call it, constructive criticism
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melvin England
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 707
From: Hull, East Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Feb 2016
|
posted January 27, 2019 08:53 AM
I think this discussion clearly demonstrates that the description of a film is not an exact science. What is "excellent" for one is "good" for another. Faded red is an absolute "No No" for many and a "so what?" for others.
I find that, generally, descriptions on Ebay are pretty accurate. However, that is probably because the films I bid for have passed all the conditions on my "check" list.
First - Are they regular sellers* and/or are they known people from this forum? If so, that is a green light so far. Have I bought from this person before? What was my experience? Was the description accurate?......Is the asking price sensible?
Secondly - If they are not regulars, do they sound as if they are trying to be as helpful as possible? I believe a lot can be gained by judging the way the description is written and worded. Sometimes, people can come over as very guarded or potentially hostile.
Thirdly - Screenshots. Personally, I am not as fussy for pictures for 200' or less. 400' to features should be presented as much as possible. I think we can all judge by screenshots, regardless of whether they are taken with a mobile or a low quality still camera, if the film is just fading..... or is beetroot.....or scratched to hell. The sound description, though, can only be taken on trust.
Finally - Certain words or phrases that, to me, scream "avoid" or at worst "Enter at own risk." Phrases like "untested" or "sold as seen" ring the alarm bells, as does hardly any description at all. Sometimes I may take a chance on "found in my grandad's house" or, as mentioned above, an obvious non film person trying their very best to give as much info as they see fit.
Just as a last comment, another thing I have noticed with films is that if the box or container is worn out, you can bet your life that the print inside it isn't too good either. Funny, really, given this consistency in a random situation!
* not always a guarantee of good service.
-------------------- "My name is for my friends!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|