Author
|
Topic: Crash course for recording with an ELMO GS1200?
|
Osi Osgood
Film God
Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted March 13, 2019 12:04 PM
Hello ...
Would someone be willing to give me a "Recording for Dummies" version of recording with a ELMO GS1200? I am going to try a stereo record of "Empire Strikes Back". I have it on 4x800ft reels and what i am going to do ahead of time is make the stereo audio in exact clips for what is on each 800ft reel, if possible, down to the very frame, (as i can, with my audacity program, cut the audio to that exact of a point) ...
So, I need to know what to do with the actual recording process.
(Before anybody asks, no, i do not have the original manual)
I'm not sure, but would i be able to do a "sync pulse" recording by doing it this way?
I thank one and all ahead of time!
OSI
-------------------- "All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "
| IP: Logged
|
|
Rob Young.
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1633
From: Cheshire, U.K.
Registered: Dec 2003
|
posted March 13, 2019 01:37 PM
Osi, my biggest concern with this type of re-recording is introducing "wow" and other imperfections into the soundtrack.
I have had so called pros (advertising in Derann's Film For The Collector) re-record stereo tracks using a GS-1200 and sure, it was in sync, but the "wow" was just awful.
For example, "T2" - took it back to Derann for them to put the original track back on after spending good money on an advertising amateur who used a buzzy VHS to put a "wowy" stereo track on it. He also did recordings for some other releases...
I have also had real professionals like John Clancy re-record my copy of "Raiders of the Lost Ark", and whilst it all turned out well, John had to spend a LOT of time to ensure that "wow" was minimal, despite first passes being in sync. John put a lot of work into this to get good results, and he is a real pro with this kind of thing, but it took a lot of work to get not only sync, but quality recordings. I spent a day with John doing this work and it is not a task to be undertaken lightly...and he knew what he was doing.
I'd say be careful...stereo great...but don't ruin a perfectly decent mono track...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Adsett
Film God
Posts: 5003
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003
|
posted March 14, 2019 07:52 AM
IMO the Eumig 900's are better than the Elmo GS1200 for recording work. As a matter of fact I don't know how anyone ever used the GS1200 for serious sound editing where you have to constantly stop and start the machine - why? Because the GS1200 takes at least a couple of seconds to stabilize its speed after starting film movement, and that's even with the powered up flywheel inside the machine. The Eumig 900's, and indeed all Eumig's, are instant starters, up to full speed in a fraction of a second. So I do all my recordings on a Eumig 926 or 938 Stereo and just use the GS1200'S for playback. And, like Lee, I use the wild sync method, which is time consuming but can give excellent results with a projector that has a precision manual speed control like the Eumig 900's.
-------------------- The best of all worlds- 8mm, super 8mm, 9.5mm, and HD Digital Projection, Elmo GS1200 f1.0 2-blade Eumig S938 Stereo f1.0 Ektar Panasonic PT-AE4000U digital pj
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|