Years ago I bought a DIY hand crank music box (search online or see here on Amazon, though you can get them far cheaper if you search around). They come with a tiny punch which makes holes in the paper strips so you can make your own tunes:
My wife asked if this could be used to perforate 9.5mm film and I smiled and explained that no it couldn't because 9.5mm film has rectangular sprocket holes of a very specific shape and size, whereas this makes a round hole. Then I realised the punch is roughly the right width so maybe it would work. I cut down some old strips of 16mm double perf, just roughly measured by eye:
then punched holes in the film, again just measuring roughly using the lines on the pad as a guide:
The punch did the job:
And the result looked lovely:
But could it possibly work in a camera? Yes! It turns out you CAN get a square peg in a round hole (or at least, a rectangular peg in a round hole)
I tried it in 3 different models, a c1923 hand cranked Pathe Baby, a c1933 motor driven Cine Nizo Model F, and a 1959 Prince. It worked perfectly in all three. And it also worked with the single shot function in the Prince.
Here's the video showing the 3 cameras, 2 clips repeated for clarity, and the single shot function at the end.
Any thoughts on this before I try this with unexposed colour stock??
I'm hoping the claw is catching the film consistently in the same place between the sprocket hole each time, and that it's roughly central to the hole so the frame isn't shifted up or down. Maybe this wouldn't work in a projector, but at the moment I just want to be able to use these wonderful old cameras with colour film, and I can telecine the results. The sprocket hole will 'eat into' the frame at the top and bottom a little but hopefully not too much.
The next job is to automate the process a little more; at one punch every 5 seconds, I won't be going into commercial production any time soon...
The video:
My wife asked if this could be used to perforate 9.5mm film and I smiled and explained that no it couldn't because 9.5mm film has rectangular sprocket holes of a very specific shape and size, whereas this makes a round hole. Then I realised the punch is roughly the right width so maybe it would work. I cut down some old strips of 16mm double perf, just roughly measured by eye:
then punched holes in the film, again just measuring roughly using the lines on the pad as a guide:
The punch did the job:
And the result looked lovely:
But could it possibly work in a camera? Yes! It turns out you CAN get a square peg in a round hole (or at least, a rectangular peg in a round hole)
I tried it in 3 different models, a c1923 hand cranked Pathe Baby, a c1933 motor driven Cine Nizo Model F, and a 1959 Prince. It worked perfectly in all three. And it also worked with the single shot function in the Prince.
Here's the video showing the 3 cameras, 2 clips repeated for clarity, and the single shot function at the end.
Any thoughts on this before I try this with unexposed colour stock??
I'm hoping the claw is catching the film consistently in the same place between the sprocket hole each time, and that it's roughly central to the hole so the frame isn't shifted up or down. Maybe this wouldn't work in a projector, but at the moment I just want to be able to use these wonderful old cameras with colour film, and I can telecine the results. The sprocket hole will 'eat into' the frame at the top and bottom a little but hopefully not too much.
The next job is to automate the process a little more; at one punch every 5 seconds, I won't be going into commercial production any time soon...
The video:
Comment