A couple of Blackpool's ago I picked up a 16mm scope lens for a very very good price thinking "That will come in handy some day....." The lens was made by Bausch & Lomb Optical Co. in Rochester, New York. It is 2" which fits my Bell & Howell perfectly and gives a stretch ratio of 2:1
Well, today was that "some day" as I projected my first ever full length 16mm scope film.
However, on projecting the scope film, Young Winston, a couple of obvious problems arose on the screen. Firstly, there was a haze around not only the stretched image making it a rather soft focus to watch, but also around the outside of the image, too.
I must stress at this point that the lens is not foggy at all, nor does it have any signs of fungus. Theoretically, it should have been perfect.
Secondly, and this may be a separate issue, although the image was stretched correctly, it appeared that the image may have been in a different scope ratio than 2:1 because it was obvious in places that there was a little more of the top of the image that went beyond the top of the picture into the hazy bit. Is this possible ? Are there actually different scope ratio lenses for 16mm available ? Please see the next thread for a set of photos that can demonstrate what my problem is.
As you can see, at the moment I am completely confused and really don't know what to do. Can someone explain this phenomenon to me, please? I know definitely that it is NOT a print fault. I also ran a tiny segment using another trusted flat lens and not only was there NO hazy ghosting, the image was pin sharp, as it also was when I put my super 8 scope lens to my eye to check the picture in its correct format.
To quote Lennon & McCartney.......... "HELP! I need somebody!"
Thanks.
Well, today was that "some day" as I projected my first ever full length 16mm scope film.
However, on projecting the scope film, Young Winston, a couple of obvious problems arose on the screen. Firstly, there was a haze around not only the stretched image making it a rather soft focus to watch, but also around the outside of the image, too.
I must stress at this point that the lens is not foggy at all, nor does it have any signs of fungus. Theoretically, it should have been perfect.
Secondly, and this may be a separate issue, although the image was stretched correctly, it appeared that the image may have been in a different scope ratio than 2:1 because it was obvious in places that there was a little more of the top of the image that went beyond the top of the picture into the hazy bit. Is this possible ? Are there actually different scope ratio lenses for 16mm available ? Please see the next thread for a set of photos that can demonstrate what my problem is.
As you can see, at the moment I am completely confused and really don't know what to do. Can someone explain this phenomenon to me, please? I know definitely that it is NOT a print fault. I also ran a tiny segment using another trusted flat lens and not only was there NO hazy ghosting, the image was pin sharp, as it also was when I put my super 8 scope lens to my eye to check the picture in its correct format.
To quote Lennon & McCartney.......... "HELP! I need somebody!"
Thanks.
Comment