Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Day the Earth Stood Still Ken Digest

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Adrian Winchester
    replied
    Rob - to be honest, I can't guess what prompted the words "video projected nature to the picture", especially as despite this clearly not being a compliment, video projection had reached a pretty high standard by 2000! I think the distractions caused by the specks, splices and sound made evaluating the print quality unusually difficult, but my recollection is that it was at least reasonably sharp, and if the sound had been recorded better, I think I could have lived with the flaws. I have the 200' and I think it was sharper than this. I believe the release happened as a result of CHC being able to borrow the negative, so perhaps there are some 16mm prints in circulation derived from the same negative.

    Fortunately, I subsequently obtained a nice 16mm print. It's not difficult to find on 16mm as there are far more prints around than apply to most titles, although some are dupes of mediocre quality.

    Leave a comment:


  • Osi Osgood
    replied
    F 61?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Newell
    replied
    Be interesting to see if one of these prints turn up on eBay at a silly price.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob Young
    replied
    Thanks for clarifying that Adrian.

    Just to prove I'm not totally losing it, I checked the original review in Film For The Collector No. 46, Autumn 2000.

    "Visitors to my home cinema are always impressed by the clarity of the pictures. I don't think they would be quite so impressed with this. It has an almost video projected nature to the picture so that should keep many collectors happy as they consider that medium to be superior to film (burks!!!)."

    This was subsequently edited out of the review on the BFCC site, so maybe this was a review print with issues that were corrected for the release prints?

    Leave a comment:


  • Adrian Winchester
    replied
    I bought one of the full length prints from CHC, and I believe only 10 were printed. It certainly didn't have a video look and it would have been quite a nice print if not for all the imperfections. Apart from the missing frames on the master, it had more white specks in dark scenes than I've ever seen on any other print! The sound on mine was dreadful, with frequent wow, so I opted for a partial refund and a mute print, but I underestimated the difficulty of getting it recorded. When I asked Keith Wilton if he could help, he said "I already have a full time job!" Eventually, Phil was able to put me in touch with an Italian collector who was looking for a mute print and so I happily sold it to him, having warned him about the drawbacks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Newell
    replied
    Really was a title that deserved a 400ft digest release. Suppose it is lucky the release was sound and not silent. Ken did make some strange title releases choices . The Planet of the Apes digests were all released as 200s and would have been best sellers if issued as 400 digests.

    Yet, they released “dealer list perennial awfuls” like Desiree, Love is Many Splendid Thing, Turning Point, Farewell to Arms and Sherlock Holmes Smarter Brother (bought that for 50 pence) plus the infamous F61 we don’t talk about.

    Leave a comment:


  • Douglas Meltzer
    replied
    Getting back to the digest, I remember thinking that the edit was a big disappointment. Ken decided to feature the event that the title refers to, when the world's transportation comes to a halt. We hardly see Klaatu's spaceship and the worst part is Gort the robot barely makes an appearance. To top it all off, there's no "Klaatu barada nikto!"

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Newell
    replied
    Would be nice to hear an assessment from a collector who has the print.

    Leave a comment:


  • Osi Osgood
    replied
    Well, there it is! Too bad about the source material.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Newell
    replied
    Yes, a bit of a harsh review but that’s when negative sources were film not digital wear is to be expected. The blue colour stock tinge never bothered me like other collectors.I would say it is a rare feature title to have and fair praise to those who issued it.

    Part of the Review from BFCC site

    Sadly with the non-availability of black and white stock we have to endure this classic on colour stock and the unavoidable blue tint that provides. There is also the odd scratch on the master and at the original reel changes there are some missing frames. Nowt’ much to worry about there though. At least the print is sharp and that is the main criteria to consider.

    The sound on this review print was not acceptable but we understand that this was addressed for the release prints. Also, Classic Home Cinema are offering the release as either sound or mute giving those collectors who are able the chance to save some money and record the film for themselves. Given the missing frames throughout I expect this to be one of the more difficult prints to re-record. You have been warned.

    An excellent science fiction film. In conclusion all I can say is "Klaatu barada nikto."

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob Young
    replied
    There’s a review of it over on the bfcc website. John doesn’t mention the video look, so I possibly remember this incorrectly, although I’m sure I remember mention of it at the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Newell
    replied
    Originally posted by Rob Young View Post
    The Day The Earth Stood Still was available as a full length feature. CHC sold copies, so presumably they originated in Germany. I have not seen one but apparently they were not so great. From what I recall of the reviews at the time they looked as though some kind of video source had been used. And sound recording at that time for these type of review prints was, shall we say, amateur.
    Rob You are really selling it ☹️Least it will be rare!

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob Young
    replied
    The Day The Earth Stood Still was available as a full length feature. CHC sold copies, so presumably they originated in Germany. I have not seen one but apparently they were not so great. From what I recall of the reviews at the time they looked as though some kind of video source had been used. And sound recording at that time for these type of review prints was, shall we say, amateur.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Newell
    replied
    Originally posted by Osi Osgood View Post
    I could well be wrong, (as, like everyone, I don't know everything), but wasn't "Day" released as a very rare full length feature? I seem to remember it. I might be wrong. "Film God" doesn't mean all knowing, after all.

    A lot of titles have appeared as full features so this could have happened. Definitely about on 16mm. Do you think it was released by Ken like French Connection and Von Ryan’s Express?

    A mere “Sexypert “ not a “Film God” 001

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Caruso
    replied
    Well, I will pay for nicely boxed 400' LONGEST DAY & BANDOLERO...if anyone's of a mind... Shorty

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X