This seems quite a newbie question. I've looked through the forum for some clarification - if there's a good answer please point me to it.Well before I acquired my Wolverine Moviemaker Pro, I had some old family 8mm films digitized by a commercial service. This was about 6 years ago. Their procedure included splicing smaller reels together to form 200-ft, 5’ reels. I’d had some work done by them before and they’d done a good job. This time though, things came out very poorly in some segments. Among other things, they were very underexposed, which is what eventually prompted me to look for another solution and I wound up with the Wolverine unit.
I’ve re-digitized some portions of my original films, and was able to adjust the exposure so the material is viewable. (There are other issues, which I may put in a later post.) I’m going to try some other things to improve it further, but first need to understand better what “frame rate” means in the context of a clip digitized to video, and what I should do with the clips that I’ve rescanned and edited.
I’ve used the little Mac app MediaInfo to measure the frame rate for various results of scanning and editing this film. I’ve had three results:
1. The digitized version of the original print provided by the commercial service was precisely 16 frames/sec, which I understand is correct for 8mm film.
2. When I edited #1, above, down to recapture the original-length sequences in Final Cut Pro, it saved them at (very close to) 24 fps. They seemed to play at a reasonable rate, certainly not 1.5 times the original. So I’m not sure what this frame rate measure actually signifies. I'm not clear whether I should just re-edit the commercial operation’s version and set the frame rate to 16 in the project properties, or whether I can simply load the already edited clips into a new project, change the properties there, and save again. Will it actually make a difference in the rate at which the action is portrayed.
3. When I re-digitized the underexposed portion of the film in the Moviemaker Pro, the frame rate of the output is exactly 20 fps, and I believe that that is the rate at which the action will play back. From other info I’ve read, I think I should probably load the result into FCPX, change the frame rate to 16 FPS, and re-save. I want to edit this section into the rest of the material, which is now 24 fps, as described in 2, above.
I realize this is quite a newbie question, and I’ll appreciate any info. I’d been playing with 8mm for a long time, but hadn’t attempted conversion or confronted any related issues. I’ve found a few posts that address my question, including https://havecamerawilltravel.com/fin...sting-project/ and - from the earlier version of this forum - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NAmItw1SL0 . Anything else you can add would be great.
One more note - I wanted to ask this question as soon as possible, to give people time to read and post answers. That said, I’ll be unable to read or respond to any comments from Sunday May 8 through Thursday May 12. So if I don’t respond in that time, that’s the only reason why. I’m sure I’ll read and appreciate anything you can provide.
Thanks for your help.
Phillip
I’ve re-digitized some portions of my original films, and was able to adjust the exposure so the material is viewable. (There are other issues, which I may put in a later post.) I’m going to try some other things to improve it further, but first need to understand better what “frame rate” means in the context of a clip digitized to video, and what I should do with the clips that I’ve rescanned and edited.
I’ve used the little Mac app MediaInfo to measure the frame rate for various results of scanning and editing this film. I’ve had three results:
1. The digitized version of the original print provided by the commercial service was precisely 16 frames/sec, which I understand is correct for 8mm film.
2. When I edited #1, above, down to recapture the original-length sequences in Final Cut Pro, it saved them at (very close to) 24 fps. They seemed to play at a reasonable rate, certainly not 1.5 times the original. So I’m not sure what this frame rate measure actually signifies. I'm not clear whether I should just re-edit the commercial operation’s version and set the frame rate to 16 in the project properties, or whether I can simply load the already edited clips into a new project, change the properties there, and save again. Will it actually make a difference in the rate at which the action is portrayed.
3. When I re-digitized the underexposed portion of the film in the Moviemaker Pro, the frame rate of the output is exactly 20 fps, and I believe that that is the rate at which the action will play back. From other info I’ve read, I think I should probably load the result into FCPX, change the frame rate to 16 FPS, and re-save. I want to edit this section into the rest of the material, which is now 24 fps, as described in 2, above.
I realize this is quite a newbie question, and I’ll appreciate any info. I’d been playing with 8mm for a long time, but hadn’t attempted conversion or confronted any related issues. I’ve found a few posts that address my question, including https://havecamerawilltravel.com/fin...sting-project/ and - from the earlier version of this forum - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NAmItw1SL0 . Anything else you can add would be great.
One more note - I wanted to ask this question as soon as possible, to give people time to read and post answers. That said, I’ll be unable to read or respond to any comments from Sunday May 8 through Thursday May 12. So if I don’t respond in that time, that’s the only reason why. I’m sure I’ll read and appreciate anything you can provide.
Thanks for your help.
Phillip
Comment