Welcome to the new 8mm Forum!
The forum you are looking at is entirely new software. Because there was no good way to import all of the old archived data from the last 20 years on the old software, everyone will need to register for a new account to participate.
To access the original forums from 2003-2019 which are now a "read only" status, click on the "FORUM ARCHIVE" link above.
Please remember registering with your first and last REAL name is mandatory. This forum is for professionals and fake names are not permitted. To get to the registration page click here.
Once the registration has been approved, you will be able to login via the link in the upper right corner of this page.
Also, please remember while it is highly encouraged to upload an avatar image to your profile, is not a requirement. If you choose to upload an avatar image, please remember that it IS a requirement that the image must be a clear photo of your face.
Thank you!
Can someone explain to me why television advert makers quite often choose to film their adverts in cinemascope and academy ratio's instead of just sticking to the widescreen TV format ? Seems pointless to me as the product that a company is promoting and costing an arm and a leg to produce, isn't being splattered across the whole screen !
They do it to help those of us watching a DVR recording can skip the commercials more easily.
They do it to annoy those cell phone users who insist the wide screen should only be shown in PillarBox.
The do it to make their commercial look like a high budget motion picture. If they film the commercial in wide screen and black and white, it makes there film look like a prestige production like Roma.
All kidding aside, I have no idea why they would, or why they would not, other than the same reasons film makers chose to shoot in scope.
You brought a smile to my face, Ed. How very true.
How very true could also apply these days, as you say, to film makers still filming in cinemascope. Most of the cinema screens these films are designed for are not even in scope ratio, so instead of being W I D E, they are just smaller and flatter to fit on the 1.85:1 ratio these new screens are built at.
Infuriating. Why bother ?
Long gone are the days when the trailers etc were one width, then suddenly one saw the screen get wider.... and wider... and wider for the main feature.
Roll on the introduction of cinemascope ratio televisions......
And once we've all agreed on bringing cinema widescreen to the living room, it's time to talk about my plans for TV makers to make 8K sets that are tall instead of wide, so we can watch 1.43:1 IMAX at home properly…
I suspect that all TV commercials are filmed electronically at 16:9, a film shoot being very rare. The bars are put in during post production to give an impression of a big budget, a device started in the 1980's with pop videos. The same applies to dramas and cheaply made, direct to streaming movies.
About 10 years ago, at IBC, the second largest broadcast exhibition/convention in the world, Sony, because they could, showed a massive 80x8 approx screen occupying the width of their massive stand. They showed a fixed camera football match covering the whole length of the pitch with all four corner flags in view.
The cinematic experience crept into Wedding production for the Bridezilla brigade who paid extra to have black borders.
Whilst some TV ads are obviously made for cinema, the strict UK and specs, don't care about borders as long as the aspect ratio is 16x9 and all the other technical levels are conformed to. It's artistic "innit".
I suspect that all TV commercials are filmed electronically at 16:9, a film shoot being very rare. The bars are put in during post production to give an impression of a big budget, a device started in the 1980's with pop videos. The same applies to dramas and cheaply made, direct to streaming movies.
Most high end cinematic video cameras ie from Sony, Alexa, Red etc offer multi mode sensors. Production has moved on from the early days of shooting on 4x3 16x9 safe with black tape on the viewfinder and monitors.
Comment