8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Print Reviews   » Chickens Come Home (1931) Laurel and Hardy

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Chickens Come Home (1931) Laurel and Hardy
Joseph Randall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 437
From: Wyckoff, NJ, USA
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted July 13, 2015 01:58 PM      Profile for Joseph Randall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Blackhawk print on 1972 Eastman film stock
Super 8 sound, 600 feet

One of the best Laurel and Hardy shorts, this is a remake of their silent LOVE'EM AND WEEP (1927.) This one has grown in reputation over the years by fans, having been unfairly maligned in a few books published in the 1960s on the boy's films. (Charles Barr called it "a dud.")

There's plenty of info online about the plot, so let's get to the print. This is not one of the better Blackhawk prints. It is a bit dark and dupey looking, which is surprising since L&H prints from 1972 are generally above average to excellent. The sound on mine in bass-heavy, and is not as crisp and clear as I'm accustomed to with Blackhawk prints. I don't have the original box, but this certainly would have been delivered in a pink Eastin-Phelan box on 2X400' reels.

Curious if anyone else has seen a Blackhwak print of this in Super 8? If so, how was it?

 |  IP: Logged

Gary Crawford
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 979
From: Manassas, VA. USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 13, 2015 03:15 PM      Profile for Gary Crawford     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have not seen a Super 8 print of it. I have a 16mm. I can remember well back in the mid 60's one of our local TV stations would run that one every time a baseball game broadcast ended early or was rained out. Even then, the print supplied for TV was much more flawed and dupey looking than the other Laurel and Hardy's they ran. Sound was noisey as well. Good preprint evidently did not exist.
I thought Chickens was a really good combination of situation comedy and slapstick. But the only totally "out there" thing about was the absurd idea of Ollie running for mayor.
I loved Mae Busch in this. Very Very mean, but very very sexy.
I would not have minded being her "apple cheeked boy".

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph Randall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 437
From: Wyckoff, NJ, USA
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted July 13, 2015 07:44 PM      Profile for Joseph Randall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is your 16mm a Blackhawk, Gary? There has been a seller listing this on ebay for $75 in 16mm for the last few months and it gets no bids. How's your print?

 |  IP: Logged

Gary Crawford
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 979
From: Manassas, VA. USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 14, 2015 07:48 AM      Profile for Gary Crawford     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
my 16 is a Blackhawk....looks about like all the others I've seen. not bad..just not great. probably worth 75 if in perfect physical condition and isn't a dupe of a Blackhawk. ooh, that would be awful.

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph Randall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 437
From: Wyckoff, NJ, USA
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted July 14, 2015 03:54 PM      Profile for Joseph Randall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks, Gary.

The Blackhawk L&Hs I have in 16mm are all bona-fide originals and look great. They are usually trumped only by a Films Classics original or printdown. I think Blackhawk cut-corners with their Super 8 prints. Sounds like for CHICKENS, Film Classics is the way to go.

There are some collector's who insist that older L&H Blackhawks, with Film Classics titles, are indeed dupes.

[ July 14, 2015, 07:48 PM: Message edited by: Joseph Randall ]

 |  IP: Logged

John Hourigan
Master Film Handler

Posts: 301
From: Colorado U.S.A.
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted July 15, 2015 09:15 AM      Profile for John Hourigan   Email John Hourigan       Edit/Delete Post 
Agree, Joseph -- while I'm probably committing blasphemy on this board by saying so, it appears Blackhawk cut corners with their Super 8 L&Hs as my prints have faces that are washed out. My Our Gang Super 8s generally look good, though.

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph Randall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 437
From: Wyckoff, NJ, USA
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted July 15, 2015 04:37 PM      Profile for Joseph Randall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, most of my Blackhawk Our Gangs in Super 8 (over 50 of them!) look superb. A notable exception is OUR GANG FOLLIES OF 1938 -- bathtub dupey.

I do have many Blackhawk Super 8 L&Hs that are superb -- notably THE MUSIC BOX, COUNTY HOSPITAL, and THEIR FIRST MISTAKE, among others.

 |  IP: Logged

Timothy Ramzyk
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 220
From: Milwaukee,WI,USA
Registered: Nov 2006


 - posted July 16, 2015 01:31 AM      Profile for Timothy Ramzyk   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had a Super 8 Blackhawk. It's true that it was a little contrasty, but not by any means bad. I bought my print used, and the first reel had a faint "ticking" on the soundtrack that only I seemed to notice, but I did notice it. I assumed it was unique to my print.

It's one of there most underrated, and one of their rare three-reelers running a whole half-hour.

The Vivendi Entertainment DVD set has a nice print of the US cut, but also offers a rather incredible nearly 4 reel version of the Spanish Language cut, which a guarantee will shock the uninitiated.

Spoiler, Spoiler, Spoiler
During the the party scene at Oliver Hardy's house we are treated to entertainment not in the US cut, the weirdest of which is Hadji Ali, a man who literally consumes then projectile vomits tumblers of water, stones, and fire for Ollie's guests. I kid you not, and it's the real deal!

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph Randall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 437
From: Wyckoff, NJ, USA
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted July 16, 2015 03:23 PM      Profile for Joseph Randall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I've seen the Spanish version.
[Eek!]

The ticking was probably unique to your print, or at least to that run of prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Gary Crawford
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 979
From: Manassas, VA. USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 17, 2015 07:48 AM      Profile for Gary Crawford     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes..the quality of Blackhawk films from the Hal Roach material varied greatly. And sometimes it changed on the same subject when new preprint was acquired. I remember being disappointed with my print ...standard 8 sound (1965 or so) of Way out West.
it was as if someone had put a coating of Vaseline on the printer lens or something. Gray scale was fine, but no detail.
A few of the Our Gangs and Charlie Chases also looked like that.
Then, you'd get Scram or Going Bye Bye....the super 8 prints of those are really nice, at least the prints I got were.
And it was odd..and has always puzzled me that most all of the silent era films they put out, even when original preprint was in bad physical shape, were very sharp and did not have that fuzzy look to them at all. The Larry Semon comedies ...at least the ones I have, look better than almost any of the much later sound Laurel and Hardy's and such. Quality of preprint is so vital to making decent prints.
Even Niles, often vilified for terrible quality, was able to turn out some excellent prints when they had good pre print and weren't duping others' dupes. Their Invisible Ghost and Meeting at Midnight and a few others were very good.
Each day that goes by lessens the chances of finding good original preprint material or 35mm prints of those Laurel and Hardy's , such as Chickens Come Home. And of course, now there would not be any new prints for collectors even if better preprint was available. Rather sad, I think.

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph Randall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 437
From: Wyckoff, NJ, USA
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted July 17, 2015 01:49 PM      Profile for Joseph Randall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've had nearly the same experience, Gary. Super 8 silent era L&H -- superb. SCRAM, GOING BYE-BYE, same. The Niles Rathbone/Holmes are all excellent.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Caruso
Film God

Posts: 4105
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 18, 2015 03:15 PM      Profile for Joe Caruso     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Super 8 CHICKENS is finely done - I can boast about Blackhawk, being a leading collector - True, some of the other shorts were a bit washed (HOG WILD, MEN O WAR as for instance) - BLOTTO, CHICKENS, MURDER CASE, BE BIG, OLIVER THE 8TH, ANOTHER NICE MESS,BEAU HUNKS and MUSIC BOX, all the longer ones were of sharp quality - Shorty

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph Randall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 437
From: Wyckoff, NJ, USA
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted July 18, 2015 09:49 PM      Profile for Joseph Randall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I must have gotten a bad print of CHICKENS, then.
My BLOTTO, OLIVER THE 8TH, ANOTHER FINE MESS, BEAU HUNKS and MUSIC BOX are all good. My BE BIG is like my CHICKENS. My HOG WILD and MEN O WAR are much better than CHICKENS. I guess it's the luck of the draw.

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph Randall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 437
From: Wyckoff, NJ, USA
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted July 24, 2015 08:22 PM      Profile for Joseph Randall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I do want to point out that pedestrian prints like CHICKENS are/were a product of their time -- the early '70s before home VCRs were available. Back then, even prints like CHICKENS looked leaps and bounds better than what you saw on small TV screens, with reception good/bad depending on the channel or even the weather. (Does anyone remember ghosting, or rolling pictures?) And -- you could watch the print any time you wanted! We are spoiled now with HD and transfers directly from 35mm original negatives.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael De Angelis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1261
From: USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted July 25, 2015 01:04 AM      Profile for Michael De Angelis   Email Michael De Angelis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I once owned a Super 8 on "Chickens" and it was not washed out.

The print had excellent saturation, and sharpness, in both picture and sound.

I now have a 16 from Blackhawk and it's 35mm knock out quality.

Yes, there are excellent prints floating around.

--------------------
Isn't it great that we can all communicate about this great
hobby that we love!

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph Randall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 437
From: Wyckoff, NJ, USA
Registered: Jun 2015


 - posted July 25, 2015 11:08 AM      Profile for Joseph Randall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael,

Yes, if I decide to upgrade that print I will probably opt for 16mm -- the price is not that much more these days.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2