8mm Forum


  
my profile | my password | search | faq | register | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» 8mm Forum   » 8mm Forum   » Off-Center Prints

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Off-Center Prints
Mike Tynus
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 135
From: Addison, IL, USA
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted July 10, 2008 06:57 PM      Profile for Mike Tynus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hello everyone,
I was wondering why there are occasional Blackhawk prints where the film frame is printed off center? I have 2 sound copies of Chaplin's THE CURE that both have the image moved to the left of frame leaving a chunk of black on the right side, rendering almost a square image. I also have a sound print of WAY DOWN EAST where all 6 reels are also to the left of screen. Yet the Blackhawk intro titles seem fine, leaving me to believe that the copy isn't defective, but something was up with the preprint material. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks!

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted July 10, 2008 10:37 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Could they have been wanting to preserve the original nearly square image?

But then, it seems like they would have centered it squarely.
They were ones for detail.

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Tynus
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 135
From: Addison, IL, USA
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted July 11, 2008 12:47 PM      Profile for Mike Tynus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Osi,
Thanks for the input. What you say makes perfect sense as when I watch these films it never seems like anything is missing or getting cut off. And yes, Blackhawk was such a caring company. Wondering if anyone else has seen this.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Stucchio
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 625
From: New Jersey
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted July 11, 2008 06:33 PM      Profile for Tony Stucchio     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There is a great article in the December 1975 issue of the Blackhawk bulletin that describes why they did this to the recently restored Chaplin Mutuals. I think David Shepard wrote the article. In a nutshell, it was to restore the original full-frame image, which was bigger before the advent of soundtracks being added to film.

 |  IP: Logged

Kevin Faulkner
Film God

Posts: 4071
From: Essex UK
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 11, 2008 06:37 PM      Profile for Kevin Faulkner         Edit/Delete Post 
If you look at these non centered prints off the projector do they still look off centre. In other words if you look at the film frames with a magnifying glass.
I have seen one or two projectors where the gate runners have not been setup perfectly which means the film is projected slightly to one side.
Have you tried these "off center" prints through another machine to see if they are the same? and what projector are you using?

Kev.

--------------------
GS1200 Xenon with Elmo 1.0...great combo along with a 16-CL Xenon for that super bright white light.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Stucchio
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 625
From: New Jersey
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted July 11, 2008 06:50 PM      Profile for Tony Stucchio     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, Blackhawk did this on purpose. What I don't understand is if the picture in the silent days was wider since you didn't have to leave room for the soundtrack, wouldn't preserving the entire image have to be done in letterbox format rather than bars at the side of the pic?

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted July 11, 2008 08:10 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, the silent film ratio WAS an almost perfect square, so cropping the sides would preserve the original aspect ratio.

Well done Blackhawk!

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Tynus
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 135
From: Addison, IL, USA
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted July 12, 2008 02:48 AM      Profile for Mike Tynus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I ran these films through an S940, ST1200 and GS1200 with the same results.
That's great info concerning the 1975 Blackhawk article. That makes these off center prints all the more fascinating to watch now. And to think that the DVD copies are probably lobbing off the top and bottom of the frame! Thanks for all the input.

 |  IP: Logged

Kevin Faulkner
Film God

Posts: 4071
From: Essex UK
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 12, 2008 10:21 AM      Profile for Kevin Faulkner         Edit/Delete Post 
At least it's consistent between machines. As others have said it's obviously down to Blackhawk preserving the original. Fascinating [Smile]

Kev.

--------------------
GS1200 Xenon with Elmo 1.0...great combo along with a 16-CL Xenon for that super bright white light.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Brandenstein
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1632
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007


 - posted July 14, 2008 01:11 PM      Profile for Bill Brandenstein   Email Bill Brandenstein   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well guys, I don't agree. The "nearly square" image can't be from soundtrack cropping, because my own ruler confirms what is given at this Wikipedia link, that the full-frame area is approximately 19x25mm. This yields an aspect ratio of about 1.3:1. Here's an example:
 -
Bear in mind, and I know most of you know this, that the thick frame lines common to most theatrical releases in the 30s-early 50s (when 'scope called for the use of the full frame height again) was due to preserving a 1.33:1 ratio after the soundtrack stole some of the width.
 -
I hope that cinematographers have correct framing marks in their viewfinders when cropping is done like this:
 -

Well, my 2c is that Blackhawk made an error, whether just sloppy or due to a mistaken assumption concerning the aspect ratio.

I had to file out the Std 8 aperture window for my Eumig 810D because it covered up the left side of the picture, initially making it nearly square. Maybe Blackhawk had a conspiracy going with Eumig!

 |  IP: Logged

Claus Harding
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1149
From: Washington DC
Registered: Oct 2006


 - posted July 14, 2008 06:53 PM      Profile for Claus Harding   Email Claus Harding   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Academy" framing then and later...1:1.33 was the original silent matte, 1:1.37, as I recall (please correct me if this is wrong) was the later aspect when the soundtrack needed space, so the image got a bit wider due to the top/bottom getting trimmed.

In Blackhawk's Super-8 version of 'Nosferatu' you are treated to a variety of aspect ratios, including the classic 'almost square' silent matte.

Claus.

--------------------
"Why are there shots of deserts in a scene that's supposed to take place in Belgium during the winter?" (Review of 'Battle of the Bulge'.)

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted July 14, 2008 07:19 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Am I right to say that the 35MM frames of cartoon that we saw are from Tex Avery's "Farm of Tomorrow"?

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Caruso
Film God

Posts: 4105
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 15, 2008 02:32 PM      Profile for Joe Caruso     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is that film of the upside down character, reminds of what has happened to me on occasion - Never had an off-center problem, though interested to know more dealing with aspect ratios

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Brandenstein
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1632
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007


 - posted July 15, 2008 05:24 PM      Profile for Bill Brandenstein   Email Bill Brandenstein   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry, Joe, I don't have a title on that one. But Osi ought to win a prize for correctly identifying the cartoon. (Osi, if you used to have too much time on your hands, I know that's changing! [Wink] )

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Tynus
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 135
From: Addison, IL, USA
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted July 24, 2008 04:54 AM      Profile for Mike Tynus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just an update: I just ran a print of the Blackhawk Sampler MOVIES THAT TALK AND SING, and lo and behold there was a clip of THE CURE that was centered!
So I scanned a comparison of the off-center shot:

 -

With the centered shot:

 -

As you can see the off-center shot is missing nothing at all, whereas the centered shot is cutting off Chaplin's feet at the bottom of the frame and a twitch of image off at the left.

So it does seem that we are seeing more image with the off-center shot as per the Blackhawk article Tony mentioned earlier.
But this could also be re-cropping for the sake of this sampler reel. Who knows?

 |  IP: Logged

Kevin Faulkner
Film God

Posts: 4071
From: Essex UK
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted July 24, 2008 06:05 AM      Profile for Kevin Faulkner         Edit/Delete Post 
I would say that on the Blackhawk off center print there is some cropping off the top compared to the centered print where the cropping is at the bottom!

Kev.

--------------------
GS1200 Xenon with Elmo 1.0...great combo along with a 16-CL Xenon for that super bright white light.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Brandenstein
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1632
From: California
Registered: Aug 2007


 - posted August 01, 2008 12:30 PM      Profile for Bill Brandenstein   Email Bill Brandenstein   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Great photos, Mike. Interesting that the off-center shot, which looks like it could be a more direct 35mm reduction, has better detail and contrast. Note that the lower centered sample has artifacts on the left side that resemble edges of 16mm sprocket holes -- maybe too many generations from the source?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Tynus
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 135
From: Addison, IL, USA
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted August 10, 2008 10:08 PM      Profile for Mike Tynus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Bill. Yes, the off-center print does have better picture quality and that's a great point about the film markings.
Incidentally, I just bought a Blackhawk print of Our Gang's BARGAIN DAYS, which is oddly off-center only on specific shots, suggesting perhaps that they may have been filmed that way.

 |  IP: Logged

Robin Cook
Junior
Posts: 2
From: Newark
Registered: Sep 2007


 - posted August 12, 2008 04:27 PM      Profile for Robin Cook   Email Robin Cook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have read all of the posts so far and I feel I must tell you what I know about the black borders. In 1990, I bought a 16mm copy of "Easy Street" (Charlie chaplin Mutual) and it had a square image with black borders. I thought that's how it should be but in 1992,I met David Shepard at the Sons of the Desert Laurel and Hardy/Our Gang convention. I had pre-ordered some 16mm films from him and on his stall, he was showing "Cat, Dog & Co." (Our Gang) on a B&H 1695 16mm projector. I noticed it had a square picture with black borders with the edge of the subtitles on the left side cut off. I asked him why it had the borders. He said a soundtrack had been on the preprint material so the left hand side of the picture was missing. He went on to say that some of the Mutual Charlie Chaplins were like it such as "The Immigrant" "The Cure" etc. but they were much better picture quality than the full framed versions that they had. He said he could make them 1:1.33 but it would crop the picture and he wanted to preserve the full frame of what was left. Blackhawk did also crop some of the picture in order to make a full frame version (which looks like what they have done on those scans of "The Cure"). In 1988, I saw a 35mm print of "Perfect Day" (Laurel and Hardy) and noticed I could see MUCH more picture at the top of the screen. I went home thinking how much was missing off my super-8 and video copies. In the early 1990s, I found out that the early talking L&Hs up until 1931 were filmed with the full silent frame and with a soundtrack cropping the left of the frame which we're not supposed to see in this case, anyway. That explained why I saw more of the picture than I was used to in "Perfect Day" and I then realised you're not supposed to see the whole frame all at once. The operator hadn't got the framing right. Those scans of Bill Brandenstein's are an excellent example of what I mean. The 35mm cartoon shows how much you're supposed to see, and the frames with the train show a square image (is it shown as a mirror image?)that you aren't supposed to see all at once (in sound films). If it's a silent frame, 1:1.33 is 3 units by 4 so it isn't a square frame as shown in the cropped Blackhawk films. I've since seen full framed versions of the Charlie Chaplin Mutuals which show that we can see more than the cropped versions.

Robin.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Caruso
Film God

Posts: 4105
From: USA
Registered: Jun 2003


 - posted August 12, 2008 05:31 PM      Profile for Joe Caruso     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
THis is off-topic, now on EBAY is a 'scored' edition of DOUBLE WHOOPEE, I think this was a dubbed one with Chuck McCann, unless someone can enlighten - It's a Super 8 Sound nonetheless - On the thread of off-center, nothing more than that, if the picture is clear, okay, the only defect is an out of kilter frame - My nickel

 |  IP: Logged

Osi Osgood
Film God

Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted August 12, 2008 10:52 PM      Profile for Osi Osgood   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have to say, having looked at the two shots from the Chaplin film, and the restored version, I don't see a lot of difference.
I do see that one has better contrast to the print, but while one shows more of the feet, the other also gives more of the top.

When your dealing with a flat image from a flat master, I don't believe that your really missing two much and, as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't matter so much that I would buy a print that's a "perfect square".

Now, I HAVE noticed that many DVD's will have a letterboxed or "widescreen" version of a movie, (Tender Mercies, for instance), not only have I noticed that the full flat image is better on the film print, there is actually also more information on the left and right hand side as well.

--------------------
"All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Visit www.film-tech.com for free equipment manual downloads. Copyright 2003-2019 Film-Tech Cinema Systems LLC

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2