Author
|
Topic: full feature vs. digests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graham Ritchie
Film God
Posts: 4001
From: New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2006
|
posted July 16, 2007 05:03 PM
One of the things I like about Super8 is the digests, a well edited film is often better than the feature, just imagine a film like eg the latest "Titanic" as a 50min version with all the padding left out, I think it would be impressive, not everyone can afford full features, its a lot of money tied up just for the occasional screening, of course there are exceptions, one example of the use of digests are the "Fantasia" extracts you may not want to watch the full feature, but an extract carefully added, say onto a 1200ft reel with other stuff can add to make a more interesting programme. There are plenty of other examples, and these days of DVD and video projectors its just not economic to produce full length features, so as they say its better to have a slice of the cake than none at all.
Graham.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Graham Ritchie
Film God
Posts: 4001
From: New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2006
|
posted July 16, 2007 10:41 PM
Adrian I hope you are right, I would also like to see Super8 features available in the future for those that can afford it, the thing is, there has to be sufficient "up front" demand which, not only covers the costs "which must be huge" but for firms like Derann, they have to make a reasonable profit out of it as well. There is less financial risks with digests or shorts, but even here care has to be taken to release films that have a more general appeal and I stress this word "repeatability" to get the numbers, its not all "doom and gloom" for Super8, far from it, but times have changed.
Graham.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Osi Osgood
Film God
Posts: 10204
From: Mountian Home, ID.
Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted July 17, 2007 11:12 AM
There are some newbies out there on the forum, (I could be considered a newbie, having only been back in for three years now), but I believe that most collectors have been around for years ...
and quite frankly, I think the desire for more features is because we just want something new to buy. We are addicts, tho I can think of a lot worse addictions to have.
For instance, I buy an occasional feature and short, (this was one of the rare months when I have bought three features in one month, as the prices were right.), but I'm doing my best to limit myself to one affordable feature per month, partly because of a lack of funds. That, and I must admit, i just like building a collection.
Witrh the size of my collection now, I'm thinking it's about time to invest in a (Gad! Do I dare say it?) A magnectic/optical GS 1200.
(I just know I'm going to get some ribbing on that.)
But we all pretty much have our dream collections (of titles that we really want) and what we do now is collect on the side, just for the sake of expanding our collections.
-------------------- "All these moments will be lost in time, just like ... tears, in the rain. "
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Adrian Winchester
Film God
Posts: 2941
From: Croydon, London, UK
Registered: Aug 2004
|
posted July 17, 2007 06:14 PM
I take the point about edited digests potentially pushing up costs, even if the master material can be cut - so I think we would have to hope that a suitably qualified enthusiast would do it because he would be offered a print in return!
I recall that the scope feature release of 'Grease' followed the 200' extract, due to enough collectors expressing demand, so if enough collectors bought the 'End of Days' 600' and then said "I now want the rest", I'm sure Derann would give it serious consideration.
I remember hearing that 'Jurassic Park 3' was probably the last feature that Derek seriously considered releasing. As it would make an excellent release, in view of the quality and length of the film, it would also serve as a nice tribute to Derek, if it ever proved feasible.
-------------------- Adrian Winchester
| IP: Logged
|
|
|